triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Originality research

To: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Originality research
From: Bschwartz@encad.com (Barry Schwartz)
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 14:10:36 -0700
>I have several variations of early Spitfire 4 ("Mk.1") 
>brochures printed by S-T USA. Interestingly enough, they all appear to use
>the same car (possibly the "412VC" prototype or a very similar car), a
>Signal Red car but with a greyish-looking chassis frame. There is evidence
>of airbrushing of some of the photography for various reasons, perhaps to
>make quick changes without reshooting pictures
***************************************************
I have to concur with Andy here (as usual).  Since working in the consumer
manufacturing field for the past three years, our sales brochures for new
product are most often taken from early prototypes or mockups, and while
generally accurate, they usually contain small anomalies here and there such
as logos, or decals.  Usually in the quest to get them out as soon a
possible the ad dept. takes certain liberties.  Not usually anything to
worry about except in the cases such as this!

Barry Schwartz in San Diego,CA

Bschwartz@encad.com
72-V6 Spitfire (undergoing T5 transplant)
70 GT6+ (daily driver for now)
70 Spitfire (body repair on hold see above)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>