triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Info Unleaded Fuel

To: BRIAN.TINK@AG.ausgovag.telememo.au
Subject: Re: Info Unleaded Fuel
From: John Wroclawski <jtw@lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 22:08:28 -0400
Cc: stag@homer.balltown.cma.com, triumphs@autox.team.net<334708190995*/G=BRIAN/S=TINK/O=AG/PRMD=AUSGOVAG/ADMD=TELEMEMO/C=AU/@MHS>(BRIAN.TINK@AG.ausgovag.telememo.au)

   From: BRIAN.TINK@AG.ausgovag.telememo.au

   Here in Canberra I found a newspaper article which spoke about the
   health hazards and warned not to use unleaded fuel in outboard
   motors, garden equipment such as mowers, whipper snippers, do not
   use it for cleaning, do not inhale the fumes, etc etc

Oh -goody-, it's back again.

>From the gasoline FAQ:

4.15 Is unleaded gasoline more toxic than leaded?

The short answer is no. However that answer is not global, as some countries 
have replaced the lead compound octane-improvers with aromatic or olefin
octane-improvers without introducing exhaust catalysts. The aromatics
contents may increase to around 40%, with high octane unleaded fuels reaching 
50% in countries where oxygenates are not being used, and the producers have 
not reconfigured refineries to produce high octane paraffins. In general, 
aromatics are significantly more toxic than paraffins. Exhaust catalysts  
have a limited operational life, and will be immediately poisoned if 
misfuelled with leaded fuel. Catalyst failure can result in higher levels of
toxic emissions if catalysts or engine management systems are not replaced or
repaired when defective. Maximum benefit of the switch to unleaded are
obtained when the introduction of unleaded is accompanied by the introduction
of exhaust catalysts and sophisticated engine management systems.

Unfortunately, the manufacturers of alkyl lead compounds have embarked on a 
worldwide misinformation campaign in countries considering emulating the 
lead-free US. The use of lead precludes the use of exhaust catalysts, thus 
the emissions of aromatics are only slightly diminished, as leaded fuels
typically contain around 30-40% aromatics. Other toxins and pollutants that 
are usually reduced by exhaust catalysts will be emitted at significantly 
higher levels if leaded fuels are used [43]. 

The use of unleaded on modern vehicles with engine management systems and 
catalysts can reduce aromatic emissions to 10% of the level of vehicles 
without catalysts [43]. Alkyl lead additives can only substitute for some of 
the aromatics in gasoline, consequently they do not eliminate aromatics,
which will produce benzene emissions [44]. Alkyl lead additives also require 
toxic organohalogen scavengers, which also react in the engine to form and 
emit other organohalogens, including highly toxic dioxin [45]. Leaded fuels 
emit lead, organohalogens, and much higher levels of regulated toxins 
because they preclude the use of exhaust catalysts. In the USA the gasoline
composition is being changed to reduce fuel toxins ( olefins, aromatics ) 
as well as emissions of specific toxins. 

Some references:

  43.  Speciated Measurements and Calculated Reactivities of Vehicle Exhaust
       Emissions from Conventional and Reformulated Gasolines.
       S.K.Hoekman.
       Environ. Sci. Technol., v.26 p.1206-1216 (1992).

  44.  Effect of Fuel Structure on Emissions from a Spark-Ignited Engine.
       2. Naphthene and Aromatic Fuels.
       E.W.Kaiser, W.O.Siegl, D.F.Cotton, R.W.Anderson.
       Environ. Sci. Technol., v.26 p.1581-1586 (1992). 

  45.  Determination of PCDDs and PCDFs in Car Exhaust.
       A.G.Bingham, C.J.Edmunds, B.W.L.Graham, and M.T.Jones.
       Chemosphere, v.19 p.669-673 (1989).
  
  46.  A New Formula for Fighting Urban Ozone.
       T.Reichhardt.
       Environ. Sci. Technol., v.29 n.1 p.36A-41A (1995).

  47.  Volatile Organic Compounds: Ozone Formation, Alternative Fuels and
       Toxics.
       B.J.Finlayson-Pitts and J.N.Pitts Jr..
       Chemistry and Industry (UK), 18 October 1993. p.796-800.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>