| To: | twojohnsons@cox.net, SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Tigers] Aluminum Heads--a downside? |
| From: | Drmoonstone@aol.com |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:02:16 EDT |
At ratios approaching 10.5 to 1 and the marginal nature of the Tiger cooling
system it can be a factor. If you spend 3 times as much for alum heads, why
negate or downgrade their primary advantage?
Moonstone
**************
Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for
fuel-efficient used cars.
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
http://www.team.net/archive
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Tigers] Aluminum Heads--a downside?, michael king |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Tigers] BMW gas (not gasoline), William Lau |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Tigers] Aluminum Heads--a downside?, michael king |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Tigers] Aluminum Heads--a downside?, drmayf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |