Re: Dr. Gas

To:	Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>
Subject:	Re: Dr. Gas
From:	itswonderful@comcast.net
Date:	Fri, 05 Nov 2004 17:53:02 +0000

Steve,  again that configuration in Larry's article is what is known as an 
"H"-pipe.  It is not an "X"-pipe which has several related configurations 
including the tandem style cross over.

Frank
B9471116

-------------- Original message -------------- 

> Frank, and Tigers, 
> 
> Not sure, exactly, what all the X over variations you mention are, but a 
> standard X-over was documented, and illustrated by Larry Paulick in his

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Dr. Gas, Frank Marrone Re: Dr. Gas, FunbeamChuck Re: Dr. Gas, Jim Sencindiver RE: Dr. Gas, Frank Marrone RE: Dr. Gas, Dave Munroe Re: Dr. Gas, Stephen Waybright Re: Dr. Gas, Larry Paulick Re: Dr. Gas, Steve Laifman RE: Dr. Gas, Theo Smit Re: Dr. Gas, itswonderful <= Re: Dr. Gas, itswonderful RE: Dr. Gas, Dave Munroe Re: Dr. Gas, Larry Paulick Re: Dr. Gas, Larry Paulick Re: Dr. Gas, Frank Marrone Re: Dr. Gas, Larry Paulick RE: Dr. Gas, Frank Marrone

Previous by Date:	Re: Dr. Gas - Rationale, Steve Laifman
Next by Date:	Re: Dr. Gas, itswonderful
Previous by Thread:	RE: Dr. Gas, Theo Smit
Next by Thread:	Re: Dr. Gas, itswonderful
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]