I wonder why the Volvo V8 conversion interest? More power, for sure . . I
would think . . but is this also saying something about the reliability of
the stock Volvo engine? Just wondering . . nice site . . and an
interesting read.
Kirk
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Kent McLean <kentmclean at comcast.net> wrote:
> Rick (14 mpg = bad) Bastedo wrote:
>
>> There's a good old 240 wagon with 5 speed tranny not far from here, make a
>> great little grocery getter.
>>
>
> If you can find one with a bad engine, you could upgrade it to a Ford V8
> (and keep your 14 mpg status):
>
> <http://converse-engineering.**com/index.html<http://converse-engineering.com/index.html>
> >
>
> --
> Kent McLean
> '56 100 BN2
> ------------------------
>
> spridgets at autox.team.net
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.**html<http://www.team.net/donate.html>
> Suggested annual donation: $12.75
>
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/**options/spridgets/**
> khargreaves2 at
> gmail.com<http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/spridgets/khargreaves2 at
> gmail.com>
|