spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?

To: "Robert E. Shlafer" <pilotrob@webtv.net>
Subject: Re: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:45:30 -0800
Cc: Dan Gillitzer <dang@ticon.net>, spridgets@autox.team.net
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=B7228k3cTucRMoq4WRLp5pA9/6AQwk7pssfPmDdA6Jv4GdP2CCX0ujOgiM223nMy; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
References: <20051201005736.BD45BD5CD@smtpout-3203.bay.webtv.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Robert E. Shlafer wrote:

R4D's also had slightly more powerful engines, more of an enclosed main landing 
gear and if memory serves me accurately, clipped wings (or squared off 
wingtips).


The engines are something beyond me.  The enclosed landing gear was 
standard for all DC-3's, R4D's, and C-47's.  The enclosed main (and 
only) landing gear was an feature of the 105 Super DC-3's remanufactured 
by Douglas Long Beach after the war (three of them were for Capital 
Airlines.  As far as the wings go, I believe your memory is fading.  And 
a mind is such a terrible thing to lose.  All of the R4D's, and C-47 
were essentially the same and came under one War Department contract.  
While on the assembly line, minor changes were made to the aircraft to 
meet specifications set out by the Army Air Corps or the Navy 
Department.  But, alas, squared off wingtips were not one of them.

Anyone interested in the DC-3's, R4D's, and C-47's would find this site 
most enjoyable:   http://www.douglasdc3.com/  .  If you have any other 
technical production questions, I can check my Dad's assembly line 
logbooks or books.  He was certainly proud of his association with this 
fine bird.

Buster Evans




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>