spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VTR

To: <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: VTR
From: "Dr. Faustus" <dr_faustus@pcisys.net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:32:26 -0600
At 05:58 AM 5/24/2005, fred thomas wrote:
>Hi folks, been away for a few days and just came back to discover this very
>bad decision by the BoD of VTR. The basic idea for any car club is the
>preservation and continued use of the "marquee", to encourage it's use and to
>promote it's visability for all to see, no one is a freeloader, they are
>owners in search of help and it is for the members of the various
>clubs/organizations to be of help to this owner, to deny the web site to
>members only is certainly not trying to promote any good will of any kind,
>matter of fact it may very well do the opposite and force would be members
>away from joining, the VTR site was developed by T/R owners with the marquee
>as the first consideration, it should be kept that way, the cars 1st. Remember
>the cars brought all of us together but the friendships will last long after
>the cars are gone, MJB and the "Fat Chance Garage" contribute more to
>preservation of our beloved hobby than our national and local clubs, open the
>web site VTR BoD.  !!!!!  "FT"

It's been a long time since I've been over to the VTR website, but this 
news disturbed me so I went and checked it out.

The only thing I really ran across that was members only were the 
maintenance guides.

Everything else seems to be open to the public.  The buying guides.  The 
history and pictures of the cars.  The classified ads.

I fail to see what the problem is.

Andy L. 





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • VTR, fred thomas
    • Re: VTR, Dr. Faustus <=