spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Low compression in number 2

To: "'Jeff Gruber'" <jgruber@demainsoft.com>, spitfires@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: Low compression in number 2
From: "Graziano, Michael" <michael.graziano@csfb.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 11:14:06 -0400
Jeff,

Where are you?  Maybe a local list member can visit and help for the cost of
a few beers.  Or maybe somone knows of this wonder mechanic three blocks
from your house.  

Otherwise, pick up a $15 compression tester and a bit of self learned
knowledge.

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Gruber [mailto:jgruber@demainsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 10:44 AM
To: spitfires@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: Low compression in number 2



I was surprised that my car would run with such low compression values.  In 
a way, I was encouraged.  If it ran this well on two and two thirds 
cylinders, it should run like crazy on four cylinders.

I have accumulated doubts about this garage and I don't have a good 
alternative locally.  I think it is time for me to try this myself.

Hey, I'm old, but not stupid.


I think my best plan is to do as Bill J suggests.  Get a manual and figure 
it out for myself.

Thanks everyone for the help.  I'll let you know how the novice engine 
rebuilder fares.

At 10:08 AM 9/7/00 -0400, Mitchell, Doug (D.B.) wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Gruber [mailto:jgruber@demainsoft.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:39 PM
> > To: spitfires@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Low compression in number 2
> >
> >
> >
> > My mechanic says that I have the following compression readings
> >
> > 1 - 75
> > 2 - 20
> > 3 - 50
> > 4 - 75
> >
> > Needs a ring job?  Yes?
> >
> >
> > Is that something a dumb-as-dirt mechanic like myself could try?  Be
> > honest, brutal if necessary.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
>
>As Joe said, not necessarily. Who tested the compression?
>
>Are you sure that they are 75,20,50,75? That almost isn't enough
>to run. You may need just a valve job, but...
>
>I am surprised that no one has suggested the old mechanics trick
>of squirting a little oil in each cylinder and then re-checking
>the compression. (Maybe I am too old a mechanic). If the numbers
>rise, it points to rings, if they stay the same, it indicates
>valves. The other thing that should be done is a leak down test.
>This can confirm the valves/rings.
>
>With the proper manuals, you shouldn't have any problem replacing
>the rings, but if you are going that far, you might as well as
>rebuild the engine at the same time. If your compression readings
>are as low as you say, there are undoubtedly other problems as
>well.
>
>--
>Doug Mitchell
>mailto:dbmitch@peoplepc.com
>'73 Spitfire 1500


This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain 
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No 
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, 
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended 
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state 
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is 
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to 
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as 
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>