shop-talk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Shop-talk] 1965 Mustang Brakes

To: bjshov8@tx.rr.com
Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] 1965 Mustang Brakes
From: Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:17:59 -0600
On 6/26/2011 1:35 PM, bjshov8@tx.rr.com wrote:
> The latest Ford Mustang V8 seems to be a great performing engine.  IIRC it is 
>about 400hp out of 5 liters, which makes 80 hp/litre.  It was probably a 
>challenge to fit that large engine into the Mustang engine compartment.

Umm, just to keep things in perspective, five liters displacement is 305 
c.i.    That's a marginally larger displacement (about 5.5% larger) than 
the original 289 c.i. engine plunked into the original 1965 Mustang, 
which was slightly smaller, overall, than the current Mustangs.  All 
things being equal, I also suspect that the basic 305 c.i. block is 
probably lighter and a bit more compact than the earlier engines. As to 
horsepower, Carroll Shelby was getting ~ 350 hp out of the 289 block in 
the `60s, the reason why his GT-350s were named as such--and without 
fuel injection and computerized engine management.


Cheers.







-- 


Michael Porter
Roswell, NM


Never let anyone drive you crazy when you know it's within walking distance....
_______________________________________________

Shop-talk@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.96
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>