morgans
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Smoggin' & stuff

To: " LMG@GoMoG" <gomog@angelfire.com>
Subject: Re: Smoggin' & stuff
From: toad <toad@storm.ca>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:13:41 -0400
LMG@GoMoG wrote:
> 
> ---
> LMG
> GoMoG at
> http://www.angelfire.com/mi/GoMoG/
> 
> Dear Willie,
> 
> I am getting confused. On the one hand, you say
> 
> "he (Charles Morgan) tells me that the Sales
> Department at MMC is now a subscriber to this 'List'and
> is keeping him aware of those discussions which might
> be of interest. Charles is quite rightly fascinated by
>  the potential of this forum. For my own part,only wish
>  that there were many more British and Continental
>  participants so that the subject matter could evolve
>  somewhat to the discussion of issues with more modern
>  cars as well, since I gather that MMC could value this
>  input."
> 
> On the other, we have Linda Eckler's email of May
>  14, 1999 sent during this List's discussion of the Car
>  & Driver article on the modern Morgan, to wit;
> 
> "I have been asked to post the following by Chris
> Towner who just recently came back from a trip to the
>  Factory:
> 
> It is true that the Works is not happy with the Car &
> Driver article but less happy with the type of gossip/ rumor/and 
>mis-information the internet seems to
>  generate here in the US from several sources(?).  The
> article will go away the sooner the internet folks quit
>  much of this worthless chit-chat over an article by a frustrated journalist."
> 
> As you can see, I am having difficulties happily
> reconciling the two emails. What is "input" and what is
> "useless chit-chat"? And is it Big Brother, [or Son]
> who decides?
> 
> I, for one, find the simpler pleasures of sunny days
>  and over-heating less confusing.
> 
> LMG
> 
> 
> 
> Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com


Please explain over-heating, oneself or the cherished Moggie?

Toad

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>