land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Sreamliner question.

To: <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
Subject: RE: Sreamliner question.
From: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:39:38 -0600
Tom;

I think that those shapes are probably best for supersonic speeds; at
lower speeds, I have my doubts. 

But as they say, "There's more than one way to skin a cat."

Regards, Neil    Tucson, AZ


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas E. Bryant [mailto:saltracer@awwwsome.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 8:10 PM
To: Albaugh, Neil
Cc: Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com; drmayf@teknett.com;
land-speed@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Sreamliner question.

Neil,
According to Bob Pierson, who spent a number of years in engineering 
with Northrop Aircraft, the best aero shape (I am thinking profile here)

is a diamond and the next best is a wedge. In other words a diamond cut 
in half. This supports the chopped off tail. I like to think that it is 
a good shape since my car is basically a wedge.

Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/FCC

Albaugh, Neil wrote:

> Dr Kamm studied this extensively and concluded that if it wasn't
> possible to carry the streamlined body shape all the way to a point
then
> it was better to chop off the tail. I suppose he had some conclusions
as
> to where that tradeoff occurred but I don't have a copy of his paper
so
> I don't know any details; it was probably in German anyway.
> 
> Regards, Neil    Tucson, AZ






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>