land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rear Engine T's

To: <FastmetalBDF@aol.com>, <speedtimer@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Rear Engine T's
From: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 15:36:37 -0500
Just mandate a minimum wheel base (maybe 144" or so). Wings are already
allowed in /MR so I dont think you would have the kinds of problems they did
over 40 years ago.

John Beckett, LSR Comp Coupe #79


----- Original Message -----
From: <FastmetalBDF@aol.com>
To: <speedtimer@earthlink.net>; <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>
Cc: <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; <Flowbench@aol.com>;
<Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; <fosterap@flash.net>; <kturk@ala.net>;
<land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: Rear Engine T's


>          How about allowing rear engine mod roadsters with a weight
> distribution roughly approximating Fast Freddie's and Joe Law' s long
> wheelbase lakesters ...... and maybe an appropriate size wing above
> the rear of the T body  ?   As I recall one of the Dahm bros, and Fred
> Larsen, both crashed rear engined T s ....... were there many more
> with this type of roadster, or was the rule enacted for just several
> mishaps ?    I would really like to see this configuration return to
> land speed events, and think many others would, also . They are
> as CLASSIC as the severely chopped, slant post 34 coupes with
> racecar noses ala Pierson Bros / Tom Thumb Spl, Fox- Cobb, Doug
> Hartelt, SoCal, and Bob Rounthwaite ...... this style of early racecar
> seems to appeal to just about everyone ...... as American as apple pie
> and as timeless as the landscape at Bonneville .
>             Bruce

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>