healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Fuel (was: tuning and timing)

To: Derek Job <derek.c.job@gmail.com> s=q20121106; t=1370529783; bh=qozS4Hh1YCBC+hUg1/I67pfE1SQVvSGm6B2wyYfhdQY=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=s2/XxHiML0ddmRFaZ4q2ag4J8fWba3rXZ2Fbx/ZzUyQi6d41tUUCYs0eBPP2EJjrm Irn5GDx4CoLG1Wm28uY1YQw5K4Cbs6VhkD931vw/j1Azy89SD89NkJeXm/a66Kdzxn WjJJlx2Gq2ZO2PjmBiEGVWqpxYqsgh2EMdxCeN27SwuLqKIbwGgPOHuQcmKZF7NCSd BCcAYuyr2pqsFgCQaRZEtsXJ0g5ODta+AMHSmcHQolYCw+oM6N8za9kua5OVxi7GiX GYZxPoT1BzGuAzCb7aSf8LeUKrtSMoyO6FS/h8N3hoaj3RGbEOdAtF7/IzkYp4L/3H 4D7DlFTIFVcig==
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Fuel (was: tuning and timing)
From: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:43:03 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Forum <healeys@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: healeys@autox.team.net
re: "I run Shell V-Power 99 octane." 

'poor quality' fuel? 

Bob 


-------------------------------- 
Bob Spidell - San Jose, CA 

----- Original Message -----




You can call it whatever you want but it is too low octane for our cars and 
lower than they were designed for so the shop manual guidelines are not 
directly applicable. I run Shell V-Power 99 octane. 

BTW most octane boosters do not increase the octane content by the amounts 
claimed. 

Derek 



On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Bob Spidell < bspidell@comcast.net > wrote: 


re: "With the poor quality of todays fuel ..." 

What quality issues are we having with today's fuel? Many modern cars--'family' 
sedans, even--will do 150MPH and 0-60 in six seconds or less on 'pump' gas. I 
just put 3,773 miles on my BJ8 over 6 states on pump gas--granted, my car is 
not high-compression; nominal at best--with no fuel-related issue. I generally 
buy the 'name' brands--Chevron, Shell, etc.--but will buy no-name gas if 
necessary. 

AFAIK, the octane-rating tests--motor ('M') and research ('R'); the US uses the 
average of the two--haven't changed in decades, if ever, so today's 91-octane 
gas has the same anti-detonation quality as 91-octane gas from 1950. Many, if 
not all, gas stations have had to replace their underground tanks to prevent 
leakage into the environment; the side-effect being there shouldn't be much 
50-year-old crud and water sitting on the bottom. It's only anecdotal, but I 
put pump gas--probably containing ethanol--into an unlined steel can for my 
lawnmower and have had it sit for 3 years or more with no visible deterioration 
of the can or the gas (and the mower still runs fine on it). 

Not heckling here; I'd just like to know what fuel quality-related issues 
people are having--I haven't heard of any (the carping about alcohol is another 
issue--I'm not a fan of the fuel or the political policy, but I haven't had any 
trouble with it). Now, if the issue is 95-octane ((R+M)/2) gas isn't available 
at the pump any more; well that's not a quality but a supply&demand or maybe a 
cost issue (you can get 100-octane avgas at some stations in the southwest if 
you're willing to pay $6+/gal). 

Bob 


On 6/5/2013 11:48 PM, Derek Job wrote: 

<blockquote>
John 

With the poor quality of todays fuel I think that 35 degrees advance is too 
much for a road car. To answer one of your questions, that would be the 
total advance when the mechanical advance is fully operational. The vacuum 
advance is a fuel economy measure and only operates when the throttle is 
slightly open. 

Derek 






-- 
****************************** ****************************** ******* 
Bob Spidell San Jose, CA bspidell@comcast.net 

****************************** ****************************** ******* 


</blockquote>
_______________________________________________
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>