Joe,
I was hoping that would be your response. I was concerned because your post
did not say what you were referring to and the only thing
that was going on at the time was autocross rules.
Thanks for clearing that up. You can chalk up my response to "paranoia" :)
Now I will go back into my Lurk mode!
Regards,
Joe (C)
N197TR4@cs.com wrote:
>
> FOT
>
> Well, perhaps I just stepped in it.
>
> However, this should have never become an issue on Autocrossing. Nothing was
> said about Autocrossing until it was brought up as a response. There was no
> content impugning Autocrossers.
>
> My Excuse: I have received a number of complaints about postings that erode
> into chat room style exchanges that pile up messages with little value added.
>
> I should have said that to begin with, or nothing at all...sorry...instead I
> danced around the issue, trying to turn it into something positive.
>
> Yup, your right...if it aint broke, let's not fix it.
>
> Joe ("Delete Key") Alexander :-)
> 10 Years Autocrossing
> 10 Years Rallying
> 10 Years Road Racing
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
>
> Hello FOT,
>
> I am not being grumpy...
>
> We need to come up with some solutions about copying the whole list, where it
> largely concerns a small segment of the FOT list population.
>
> I developed a sub-group of Midwest TR racers who I see frequently and have a
> common bond with. We e-mail each other with our inanities without disturbing
> the greater group. That's one idea.
>
> Website Activities: This list is pretty powerful...we need to harness it.
> Thru the efforts of Mordy Dunst (Webmaster) and Henry Frye (Website
> Coordinator), the FOT website is going to become a 'living document' once
> more. One plan is to filter some information through the website. ie: the
> "Southwick Axle Conversion" for TR3/4 racers...a safety issue that might save
> a car or a life.
>
> I think comments, events, and opinions, that develop into "threads" that are
> of value to only a small segment of the list, should be avoided. Please note
> that I do not often offer an opinion of this kind.
>
> Any more ideas? Hope this was taken with the spirit in which it was offered.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Joe (A)
|