datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 1600 and 2000 Differences

To: "Eric Armstrong" <ericarm@cal.alumni.berkeley.edu>,
Subject: Re: 1600 and 2000 Differences
From: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:31:49 -0400
And a different tranny mount!

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Armstrong <ericarm@cal.alumni.berkeley.edu>
To: R Haug <haugchiro@moscow.com>
Cc: Michael Tarelka <mtarelka@home.com>; <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 2:34 AM
Subject: Re: 1600 and 2000 Differences


> 5 speed requires a different driveshaft than a 4 speed also.
> -e
>
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, R Haug wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Michael Tarelka wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Knowledgeable Group:
> > >
> > > Are the only differences between a 1600 and 2000, the size of engine
and
> > > transmission?
> >
> > Michael,
> > If you are talking about the different car models, you will find that
the
> > rear end ratio is different.  3.7 - 2000,   3.89 - 1600, Grille and
badging
> > are different.  The wiring harmess numbers are different, speedometer
and
> > tach are different, the console shift plate and radiator and the hoses.
> > Could be a few other things too.
> > Bob
> >
>
>
> Eric Armstrong
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> e-mail: ericarm@alum.calberkeley.org
> http://alum.calberkeley.org/~ericarm
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>