datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Model differnces was Re: $25k Roadster

To: "Andrew Murphy" <solex67@hotmail.com>, <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Model differnces was Re: $25k Roadster
From: "Ken Pletcher" <pletch@home.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 02:11:16 -0700
My 69 2000 doesn't have side marker lights,back up lights,reflectors,plate
lights,emblems,door handles... OH that's right!  I took them off.
     Ken
DATSTER
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Murphy" <solex67@hotmail.com>
To: <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 12:34 PM
Subject: Model differnces was Re: $25k Roadster


> All,
>
> I have always thought that Greg Vallaza's model guide on Datsun.org was
the
> most outstanding quick reference for the differences in the later models.
> Having just purchased a 1970 2000, I refer to it a lot to get an idea
about
> the differences.
>
> As I read it the following is true:
>
> 1968
>
>    No side markers at all
>    Single Back up light
>    License plate light on bumper
>
> 1969
>
>   Round rear marker
>   Teardrop from marker
>   Dual License plate lights on either side of plate
>   Single Back up light
>
> 1970
>
>   Front and rear side markes are square
>   Dual License plate lights
>   Second reverse light
>
>
> I know that some cars that were actually 68s were titled in 69 and 69 to
70.
> Doesn't Dann at Rallye have a detailed page discussing this?
>
>
> Andrew Murphy
> "Fuzzy Head"
>
> >From: "David A. Fox" <dafox1@hotmail.com>
> >To: solex67@hotmail.com, 9laser3@bright.net
> >CC: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> >Subject: Re: $25k Roadster
> >Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:23:57 EDT
> >
> >I have a late '68.  In fact its actually titled as a '69.  Mine doesn't
> >have side markers, it has a single license plate light in the bumper, and
a
> >single backup light.
> >
> >Makes ya go Hummm...
> >
> >------------------------------
> >Blue Skies & Calm Waters,
> >DAFox [SRL311-04646]
> >Oviedo, Florida
> >dafox1@hotmail.com
> >
> >
> >----Original Message Follows----
> >From: "Andrew Murphy" <solex67@hotmail.com>
> >Reply-To: "Andrew Murphy" <solex67@hotmail.com>
> >To: 9laser3@bright.net
> >CC: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> >Subject: Re: $25k Roadster
> >Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 09:41:10 PDT
> >
> >List,
> >
> >Interesting. I always thought the teardrop markers were only on the 69s.
> >And
> >I also thought the second backup light was only on the 70s.
> >
> >Andrew Murphy
> >"Fuzzy Head"
> >
> >
> > >From: "Paul" <9laser3@bright.net>
> > >Reply-To: "Paul" <9laser3@bright.net>
> > >To: "David A. Fox" <dafox1@hotmail.com>, <CalSpeed@aol.com>,
> > ><datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
> > >Subject: Re: $25k Roadster
> > >Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 12:06:00 -0400
> > >
> > >   Tear drop side markers also came on late '68's.  The difference is
> > >better
> > >seen from the tail end.  The '68 had a single license plate light in
the
> > >bumper, 69 had dual lights mounted on the body.  '68 had a single
backup
> > >light, '69 had two.
> > >
> > >Paul
> > >OROC
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: David A. Fox <dafox1@hotmail.com>
> > >To: CalSpeed@aol.com <CalSpeed@aol.com>;
datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> > ><datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
> > >Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 8:31 AM
> > >Subject: Re: $25k Roadster
> > >
> > >
> > > >I'm still a novice about these cars but the title says 1968 --
judging
> > >from
> > > >the side running lights isn't this car a 1969 ?
> > > >
> > > >----Original Message Follows----
> > > >From: CalSpeed@aol.com
> > > >Reply-To: CalSpeed@aol.com
> > > >To: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> > > >Subject: $25k Roadster
> > > >Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 00:37:35 EDT
> > > >
> > > >Hello,
> > > >
> > > >I posted a picture of the $25k Roadster.  It is a beautiful looking
> >car.
> > > >Especially when it is sitting in a beautiful showroom with many
> >exotics.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=41965
> > > >
> > > >Michael "Calspeed" Carion
> > >
> > >
> >
> >________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>