datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rare?

To: "Dan Zubkoff" <datsun65@hotmail.com>, <Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us>,
Subject: Re: Rare?
From: "Fred Katz" <fredkatz@2xtreme.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 02:07:57 -0800
Hi Dan,

Yes, I think you're right. I confused them with the '65 1500s; I know they
have hybrid features, with looks similar to the 1600s like the trunk
hardware. Other than interior cosmetics, were there any exterior
differences on the 65 to 67 1600's?

Fred

----------
> From: Dan Zubkoff <datsun65@hotmail.com>
> To: Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us; datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Rare?
> Date: Thursday, November 18, 1999 6:30 PM
> 
> 65 1500's were hybrids.
> 
> 65 1600 were the same as as the 66 1600s. (at least until some proves me 
> wrong)
> 
> Dan Zubkoff
> San Mateo, CA
> 65 SPL310
> 66 SPL311
> 
> 
> >From: Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us
> >Reply-To: Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us
> >To: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net, Waylon Harthun
<jackfrost@uswest.net>
> >Subject: Re: Rare?
> >Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:13:38 -0800
> >
> >I'm curious about the '65 1600. The count for 65-67 1600 is 10400. Just
> >how many of those '65 1600s with hybrid features were made?
> >
> >Fred
> >
> >________________________ Reply Separator ___________________________
> > >Subject: Rare?
> > >Author:  Waylon Harthun <jackfrost@uswest.net>
> > >Date:    11/18/99 10:39 AM
> > >
> > >Well according to that list, I myself have a fairly rare Roadster with
a
> > >65 1500.
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>