ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NA Pylon

To: Anthony Tabacco <atabacco@california.com>,
Subject: Re: NA Pylon
From: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@attbi.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:21:55 -0800
Well, you know how kids listen to their parents. :)
--Pat K
----------
>From: "Anthony Tabacco" <atabacco@california.com>
>To: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
>Cc: <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: NA Pylon
>Date: Wed, Jan 30, 2002, 6:12 PM
>

>She said we ain't. Retentive, that is. I wouldn't have commented on it in a
>public forum even though it is a very interesting subject to me, except that
>by coincidence, I had the very same conversation earlier this morning. It
>got me thinking.
>Tony
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
>To: "Anthony Tabacco" <atabacco@california.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:31 PM
>Subject: RE: NA Pylon
>
>
>Shoot. I haven't even read it!
>
>Please help me. What did she say?
>
>Katie
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Anthony Tabacco [mailto:atabacco@california.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:18 PM
>To: ba-autox@autox.team.net
>Subject: NA Pylon
>
>
>Pat has a really thought provoking column in the NA Pylon that just arrived
>at my door. It is regarding retention of participants, and it should be the
>subject of much reasoned discussion in this forum.
>Tony

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>