Smokerbros@aol.com wrote:
> George, don't think the Fiero owners are alone in teire declined requests.
> The early 911 guys want to update to later chain tensioners, the V-8 guys
> want windage trays, ad infinitum. The rule is the rule. If you want
>something
> within that limit, fine. If you don't, go to the next level. God knows we
>have
> enough levels of preparation. It's the only way to have a structure that
>works
> and is consistent. Otherwise, owners of certain models of cars will always
>be
> putting something over on their competitors. Kind of "legal cheating" if you
>will...
>
> Charlie
I requested allowance to put the entire cradle and rear supension form a STOCK
1988 Fiero into an early chassis. The 1988 Fiero is on the same lines and in
the same classes as the 1984-1987's. The other competitors in any class would
be
running nothing more complex than an 1988 Fiero - - which they are doing
anyway,
right now, today!
The purpose of the request was to even the playing field in SP and SM2 for 92%
of
the Fiero community so they can compete heads-up with the other 8%, the '88
model. I thought the purpose of update/backdate in the first place was to do
just that,
to even the playing field within the same car/model?
Please explain how my request could even come close to being construed as
cheating?
G
|