autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST

To: <bthatch@juno.com>, <evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com>,
Subject: RE: [evolution-disc.] Was UD/BD ST
From: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:08:08 -0500
> From: bthatch@juno.com [mailto:bthatch@juno.com]

> I've been on record for some time about the rules problems for "Street"
> Prepared. Namely, that "Street" is a misnomer and that fact will rise up
> to haunt the class in the long haul. As Steve said, the category is still
> pretty healthy in its current iteration, so leave it alone. I'm cool with
> that. But down the road when more ST classes develop to cover other cars
> than just the "ricers" and their 4-seaters, I think SP will start to look
> more and more like Prepared looks right now. At that point some sort of
> combo reorg with Prepared might be in order.

I'm having a hard time understanding how a misnomer means that a category
should be integrated into another one.  If your issue is with the name
"Street Prepared", then why not just propose changing the name?

--Andy

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>