On Tue, 24 May 2005, Navarrette, Vance wrote:
> rml:
>
> 2nd-4th is to be read as "Second through fourth"
> 3rd-4th is to be read as "Third through fourth"
>
> Sorry if that wasn't clear.
No it was clear. I think the messages got out of synch on this thread. I
sent my rpely something like a n hour ago.
Oh well.
It is funny how the harder we try to be unamibguous, the more ambiguous we
seem to sound. Ah, language. I guess you could get a PhD with this stuff.
:-)
> Vance
rml
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Lang Room N42-140Q | Not a linguist :-)
Consultant MIT unix-linux-help |
Voice:617-253-7438 FAX: 617-258-9535 | Cell: xxx-xxx-xxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|