- 1. [Shop-talk] flat screen tv to monitor (score: 1)
- Author: "john niolon" <jniolon@att.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 21:06:22 -0600
- Hi Guys looking to buy a smaller flat screen tv to use as a monitor on my desktop... probably around 30-32b .. tried one of mine hooked up thru HDMI and it worked great... no more squinting. Wife sai
- /html/shop-talk/2015-12/msg00003.html (8,816 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Shop-talk] flat screen tv to monitor (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 22:56:29 -0500
- Any modern PC can drive a 1080p monitor. It would be short-sighted to get anything less. Even laptops have 1080p screens. Doug _______________________________________________ Shop-talk@autox.team.net
- /html/shop-talk/2015-12/msg00004.html (10,220 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Shop-talk] flat screen tv to monitor (score: 1)
- Author: Brian Kemp <bk13@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 20:00:00 -0800
- John - I have a 27" TV/monitor for my computer. It is running 1920 x 1080 via a DVI cable. The computer video is part of the motherboard - nothing fancy. It is Windows 7 probably purchased in 2009. F
- /html/shop-talk/2015-12/msg00005.html (11,557 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Shop-talk] flat screen tv to monitor (score: 1)
- Author: Jimmie Mayfield <mayfield+shoptalk@sackheads.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 00:18:36 -0500
- One thing to keep in mind: if you're planning to use this solely as a PC monitor, you might well consider looking for a PC monitor that size instead of a TV. With a TV, you'll be paying for digital t
- /html/shop-talk/2015-12/msg00006.html (10,879 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Shop-talk] flat screen tv to monitor (score: 1)
- Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 23:01:30 -0800
- Even 1080 is on the low side IMO. This screen is 1920 x 1200 and I like it. Randall _______________________________________________ Shop-talk@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
- /html/shop-talk/2015-12/msg00007.html (8,710 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Shop-talk] flat screen tv to monitor (score: 1)
- Author: "Arvid Jedlicka" <arvidj@visi.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 08:24:35 -0600
- _______________________________________________ Shop-talk@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
- /html/shop-talk/2015-12/msg00008.html (8,682 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Shop-talk] flat screen tv to monitor (score: 1)
- Author: "Arvid Jedlicka" <arvidj@visi.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 08:49:36 -0600
- Try this again ... +1 on the 1920 x 1200 version, if you can find them. The norm for HD seems to be 1920 x 1080. Tons of them out there. I had to look a while to find the 1200 line version I prefer.
- /html/shop-talk/2015-12/msg00009.html (9,810 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Shop-talk] flat screen tv to monitor (score: 1)
- Author: John Innis <jdinnis@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 09:09:55 -0600
- 1080p is the minimum resolution for a computer monitor made in the last 20 years. I have a CRT computer monitor from 1997 that will do better than that. I used it with a pentium 1 processor and graph
- /html/shop-talk/2015-12/msg00010.html (10,926 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Shop-talk] flat screen tv to monitor (score: 1)
- Author: "Matt" <mbarre@juno.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:30:45 GMT
- John, 32 inch flat screens were running $150 recently (not just camp out doorbusters). 24 inch monitors with excellent resolution are running $100.To bump up to 27 inch monitor is around $150. There
- /html/shop-talk/2015-12/msg00011.html (9,362 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu