Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*front\s+springs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*front\s+springs\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Front Springs (score: 1): Author: "Bob" <engl@accesscomm.ca>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:29:13 -0600; I just finished redoing the front suspension on my '65 B. It seemed to raise the car about 2" at the front, so you can imagine how worn to old parts were. However, now the front seems too high. What; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00265.html (7,453 bytes)
2. RE: Front Springs (score: 1): Author: "Larry list account" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:11:27 -0600; What bushings did you install? If they are the rubber type, you must have the wheels fully loaded with weight of the car when you tighten the suspension. Not doing this will cause the car to sit too; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00266.html (8,117 bytes)
3. Re: Front Springs (score: 1): Author: James Harwood <james.harwood@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:47:45 -0700 (PDT); Proper ride height for the chrome bumper B is 13.5 inches measured from the centre of the wheel to the bottom edge of the chrome trim strip. I have heard that it is best not to judge the ride height; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00267.html (8,295 bytes)
4. RE: Front Springs (score: 1): Author: "Bob" <engl@accesscomm.ca>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:27:06 -0600; I installed a combination of poly and rubber bushes. The full weight of the car was on the suspension before tightening, so I should be OK there. Based on your spring table, it looks like I have RB; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00274.html (8,020 bytes)
5. Re: Front Springs (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:35:27 +0100; I currently have RB roadster springs on my CB roadster. The RB springs are shorter but harder, the result is almost exactly the same ride-height, but with much less dive and roll. I'm pretty sure the; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00278.html (7,545 bytes)
6. Re: Front Springs (score: 1): Author: "Eric J Russell" <ejrussell@mebtel.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:00:53 -0400; -- Original Message -- I just finished replacing the A-arm bushes on our '78 MGB a few days ago. The springs had an orange strip painted vertically on the springs. Eric Russell Mebane, NC http://comm; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00295.html (7,463 bytes)
7. Front Springs (score: 1): Author: Barrie Robinson <barrie@look.ca>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:05:28 -0700; I had some mental problems with ordering front springs for my 1970 MGB GT (now a V8) and installed 264-390s. However, this sat the front too high so in went another pair that I had bought previously; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00311.html (7,396 bytes)
8. Front Springs (score: 1): Author: "Chris Chandler" <barak@voyager.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:20:50 -0400; I'm parting out my '72 B Roadster and was wondering, are front springs good as long as they're not broken? Or do they compress over the years to the point where they are no good any more? If so, how; /html/mgs/2001-04/msg01041.html (6,676 bytes)
9. RE: Front Springs (score: 1): Author: "Chris Chandler" <barak@voyager.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:06:09 -0400; Thanks, that was exactly what I was looking for! Chris Chandler /// /// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list /// (If they are dupes, this trailer may also catch them.); /html/mgs/2001-04/msg01044.html (6,827 bytes)
10. front springs (score: 1): Author: "Ptegler" <ptegler@gouldfo.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:22:16 -0500; Anyone have any idea what the difference is in the 62-74 Roadster front springs - AHH6451K and the 62-74 GT front springs - BHH1077 yes.. I assume it has something to do with vehicle weight, but I'm; /html/mgs/2001-01/msg00889.html (6,630 bytes)
11. RE: front springs (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:31:10 -0800; The following are free lengths. I made the chart so that I could check stock, and also handle customer questions over the phone. Back in the good ole days, we would put a used set of GT front spring; /html/mgs/2001-01/msg00892.html (8,141 bytes)
12. Re: front springs (score: 1): Author: <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:10:18 -0000; Clausager says the GT had longer and stiffer springs to the roadster, and the later GT springs were also used on the V8. The change in numbers occured in 72 when both types were increased in length b; /html/mgs/2001-01/msg01003.html (10,330 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]