Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bumpers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bumpers\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. bumpers (score: 1): Author: JohnZissler@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 07:33:07 EDT; Hi all, just thought I would ask anyone that has an opinion on what is the best solution to my problem. I have some chrome (he said jokingly) bumpers for my MkII and the chrome is very dull, in fact; /html/spitfires/2002-06/msg00128.html (8,250 bytes)
2. RE: bumpers (score: 1): Author: Richard Gosling <richard.gosling@exprogroup.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 09:13:04 +0100; Not speaking from any sort of experience, but I have my doubts that a painted bumper will look even remotely similar to a shiny mirror-finish chromed one, it may look more like a sort of matt silver; /html/spitfires/2002-06/msg00153.html (8,725 bytes)
3. Re: bumpers (score: 1): Author: "Nolan Penney" <npenney@mde.state.md.us>; Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:14:32 -0400; As always, the choice is yours. A number of the chrome paints do a fine job of creating a chrome look. As in true shiny surface, not merely silvery grey. Hi all, just thought I would ask anyone that; /html/spitfires/2002-06/msg00182.html (7,674 bytes)
4. bumpers (score: 1): Author: JohnZissler@aol.com; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:55:42 EDT; Hi Listers, does anyone know of any problems in putting MkIII bumpers on a MkII. Are the mounting brackets exactly the same. I dont want to go buying these MkIII bumpers if they dont fit my MkII, so; /html/spitfires/2002-06/msg00471.html (7,672 bytes)
5. Re: bumpers (score: 1): Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:32:16 -0700; Mk3 front bumpers are not the same and will probably not fit your car, at least not without significant modifications. They have different mounting points and no notches cut out of them the way Mk1; /html/spitfires/2002-06/msg00472.html (8,800 bytes)
6. Re: bumpers (score: 1): Author: Dan Canaan <flinters@picarefy.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:59:57 -0700; Mk II and Mk III front bumpers are not interchangable due to differences in the way they mount- the Mk III units were mounted higher than the Mk I and II which are interchangable. Rear bumpers *will*; /html/spitfires/2002-06/msg00473.html (8,155 bytes)
7. Re: bumpers (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:41:56 -0700; Generally speaking, it is not a good idea. First, the Mk3 bumper is mounted much higher than the Mk2 and to support it, the frame hinges and the bonnet hinge pieces are different. So not only will yo; /html/spitfires/2002-06/msg00474.html (8,030 bytes)
8. Re: bumpers (score: 1): Author: "Michael D. Porter" <mporter@zianet.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:11:37 -0600; Not to mention better for airflow into the radiator, as well. Cheers. -- Michael D. Porter Roswell, NM (yes, _that_ Roswell) [mailto:mporter@zianet.com] The gulf between content and substance continu; /html/spitfires/2002-06/msg00475.html (8,470 bytes)
9. bumpers (score: 1): Author: Bradley D Richardson <bradrichardson@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:30:14 -0700; I realize some people might think this sacrilegious,,,, but what's involved in taking both the front and back black bumpers off a 79 Spit, and installing them on a 76 Spit, other than the obvious unb; /html/spitfires/2000-10/msg00442.html (6,598 bytes)
10. Re: bumpers (score: 1): Author: Bradley D Richardson <bradrichardson@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:48:30 -0700; All I can say is I happen to like the looks of the black bumpers better. Different strokes, you know. Brad ==; /html/spitfires/2000-10/msg00461.html (7,414 bytes)
11. bumpers (score: 1): Author: "Peter S." <alfapete@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 09:12:10 -0700; I've just removed the overkill US required rubber bumper overriders, center chrome bash bar and out-rigger extensions on my 76 1500. Looks far better. Nice and tight. I was wondering how the final pi; /html/spitfires/1999-07/msg00356.html (6,869 bytes)
12. Re: bumpers (score: 1): Author: Growe58@aol.com; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 20:53:09 EDT; else As I understand it: Excluding the late federal black rubber bagel bugger burbers (whatever), the basic front bumper was the same from the introduction of the Mark IV on. Different and larger ove; /html/spitfires/1999-07/msg00375.html (8,108 bytes)
13. Re: bumpers (score: 1): Author: "Peter S." <alfapete@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:47:20 -0700; better. shaped or hinges the I'm a little concerned about the lack of decent protection but thats the exchange. My Mini is much worse. I don't expect to do a lot of miles in this car anyway. It just; /html/spitfires/1999-07/msg00379.html (9,024 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]