Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\-6\s+conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\-6\s+conversion\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. TR-6 conversion (score: 1): Author: William Cianco <wcianci@mail.valverde.edu>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 95 07:15:14 -0700; To Anyone am thinking about converting the engine of my tr-6 to an american or japanese engine. has anyone out there done this conversion? would appreciate any info.; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00208.html (7,358 bytes)
2. Re: TR-6 conversion (score: 1): Author: "LARRY E SNYDER" <LESNYD@ccmail.monsanto.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 11:07:09 -0700; Yuchhhhhh! Why would they? What's wrong with the TR6 engine? Puristly yours, Larry; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00212.html (7,660 bytes)
3. Re: TR-6 conversion (score: 1): Author: David_Masucci@smtpgwy.windata.com (David Masucci); Date: Wed, 26 Apr 95 14:04:02 EST; Please don't!!!; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00215.html (7,182 bytes)
4. RE: TR-6 conversion (score: 1): Author: dan parslow <DJP@ALPHA.SUNQUEST.COM>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 11:53:32 -0700 (MST); Before I reply, some ObApprobrium: EEEEEVIL!!! EEEEEEEEEEVIL!! (picture of hoary old bearded puritan pointing a trembling bony finger at malefactor) I've got the tar, who's going to bring the feather; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00217.html (8,133 bytes)
5. RE: TR-6 conversion (score: 1): Author: DANIELS@LMSBV2.TAMU.EDU (Lee Daniels, daniels@tamu.edu); Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 14:05:57 -0500 (CDT); Some of you may recall my post of a couple of years ago regarding my finding a TR-6 housing a turbocharged 4 out of a Merkur XR4ti. While not a great job, the conversion was passable, but the owner (; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00219.html (8,096 bytes)
6. RE: TR-6 conversion (score: 1): Author: gschneid@nicmad.nicolet.com (Gary Schneider); Date: Wed, 26 Apr 95 14:45:03 CDT; Ohmigod! I have an Xr4ti and I love my TR6 for the stump-pulling torque of the six. The Merkur is hard work to drive fast with no torque and no power until the turbo spools up. Our Nissan Stanza can; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00221.html (7,804 bytes)
7. TR-6 Conversion (score: 1): Author: "Russell S. Akerman " <akerman@aloha.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 10:36:29 -1000 (HST); I know you're gonna get grief about your question...so I won't include my finger pointings too. But if you're set on this: Look at the Ford Inline 6, 300 cu. in. It would maintain some of the charact; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00225.html (7,917 bytes)
8. RE: TR-6 conversion (score: 1): Author: Michael Burdick <mburdick@netserv.unmc.edu>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 15:40:03 -0500 (CDT); This reminds me of the poor fellow that was trying to sell his Spitfire here a while back. It had a Mazda rotary transplant and he spent $$,$$$ doing the conversion. He took quite a bit of abuse over; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00226.html (8,510 bytes)
9. RE: TR-6 conversion (score: 1): Author: "Randell Jesup" <jesup@scala.scala.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 95 20:02:00 EDT; Wierd. I recently bought an '85 XR4Ti to replace my old CRX, and I've had a '70 TR6 for 6 years. VERY different cars to drive. You _really_ have to stay on the revs to go fast in the Merkur (but it; /html/triumphs/1995-04/msg00235.html (8,504 bytes)
10. Re: TR-6 conversion (score: 1): Author: Johnmowog@aol.com; Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 21:36:33 -0400; The obvious question is WHY? The TR6 motor, properly tuned and cared for, is a nice piece of work. Cam and carb work fix the power situation nicely, after all the British version, with the same basic; /html/triumphs/1995-05/msg00052.html (7,241 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]