Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Numbers\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Donna and Terry Cost" <tcost@hot.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:47:53 -0500; I have a proposal that will satisfy everybody. Print barcodes for every competetor and tape them to the car. Then issue each corner a reader with an infrared wireless transmitter. As the car comes th; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00000.html (8,101 bytes)
2. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Scott Tengen" <scott@tengen.com>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:26:49 -0400; I think this is a great idea, I would also propose bar codes on foreheads for entrants a perfect match for registration and worker assignments :) Scott read /// unsubscribe/change address requests t; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00001.html (8,747 bytes)
3. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Brian Davis" <brian.davis@rose-hulman.edu>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 11:37:55 -0500; Although I assume you're kidding, this isn't true at all. Try a red on white color scheme...the reader doesn't see anything at all ;o) Brian Davis /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordom; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00003.html (7,714 bytes)
4. RE: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:37:33 -0500; I have a proposal that will satisfy everybody. Print barcodes for every competetor and tape them to the car. Too modest. We implant chips in all competitors. Like they do to help identify lost dogs.; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00004.html (7,939 bytes)
5. RE: Numbers (score: 1): Author: Carrie Sparling <CarrieSparling@identicard.com>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:41:45 -0400; color, because the That depends if your barcode reader is infrared or visible light. Many barcode readers need not just black, but carbon black. The information contained in this electronic mail tra; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00005.html (8,412 bytes)
6. RE: Numbers (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 22:18:26 -0400; --On Monday, April 28, 2003 9:20 PM -0500 Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net> I've been trying the brute force approach for years without much success. Figured I'd try something else for a change. :-); /html/autox/2003-05/msg00010.html (9,014 bytes)
7. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 01:13:43 -0400; I never said that there wasn't a way to do things cheaply, I know people who have bought a 4.00 roll of shelf paper to cut their #s out of. I also know people who have painted their car with a brush; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00012.html (12,098 bytes)
8. RE: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Charles F. Doerge, Jr." <cdoerge@bellatlantic.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 01:49:40 -0400; After reading ad-infinitum the choice of colors, graphics, artistic design, etc, etc, I believe there is a part from Steve's post that deserves a relook... A "black and white rule". Black numbers, le; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00013.html (9,725 bytes)
9. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 22:53:33 -0700; Very good! Got it in one! On the nose! KeS /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.team.; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00014.html (8,637 bytes)
10. RE: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Madurski, Ronald M" <ronald.m.madurski@lmco.com>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 09:38:04 -0400; Chuck, your numbers look great. Use them for as long as you can. BUT, had you followed the wording in the rulebook (enforced or not, just cause you don't get caught speeding doesn't make it legal) yo; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00015.html (10,246 bytes)
11. RE: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Graeme Weston-Lewis" <gweston@lsil.com>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 10:36:47 -0600; This topic is near and dear to my heart as I recently introduced what some might class as draconian enforcement of the markings rules for the 2003 Rocky Mountain Solo Series. Basically, we have been; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00016.html (12,786 bytes)
12. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 13:38:10 -0400; The multicolor is the border stripe which fades from yellow to orange to provide extra contrast. The body of the markings are solid white. We did try a small red star on white design fill center with; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00017.html (14,442 bytes)
13. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 11:40:45 -0700; season. To me, this is the way it should be. Let's not penalize those who have put a lot of effort into highly visable numbers that are technically not to the exact letter of the law. What we are aft; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00018.html (9,008 bytes)
14. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 14:12:18 -0500; Quote From Charlie: Chuck, Leave your numbers on the car and don't worry about it. Think about this. This rule is going to get called on in Tech when they encounter really bad numbers that are *clear; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00019.html (8,599 bytes)
15. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Bradley H. Lamont" <lamont@mailhost.org>; Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 14:46:37 -0500; Jeez, this is a dumb discussion. When I started autocrossing, I was told "Your numbers are there to be visible to course workers. They are not there to make a fashion statement". I don't care how ea; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00020.html (8,518 bytes)
16. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 16:29:52 -0400; The rule is pretty clearly worded right now in my opinion, except that a minimum size for the class designation (I'd suggest a minimum of 6" with a 1" stroke), "and be placed adjacent to the numbers"; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00021.html (10,006 bytes)
17. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 16:16:37 -0500; The good news here is that Chuck's numbers, by this design and description, are legal by the old rule and legal by the proposed new one. So let's all quit giving Chuck grief over *his* numbers (that; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00023.html (8,655 bytes)
18. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: Brian Knoblauch <briank@briank.sscorp.com>; Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 18:13:32 -0400; Was the "don't score it if you can't read it" approach tried? That might result in people are more upset (since they didn't have time to fix it), but the total number of people who had to change numb; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00024.html (8,968 bytes)
19. Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:13:53 -0500; Sounds like some good point/counterpoint going on here. Keep it up. Its important that we deal with this once and move on. Since the proposal went out without some of the rationale, I'll jump in and; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00305.html (10,669 bytes)
20. Re: Numbers (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:01:07 -0400; Andy, I understand the frustration, I've expressed it myself, BUT, IMHO there still needs to be a "spirit of the rule" exemption available. I can say with certainty (I tested a number of single and m; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00306.html (13,096 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]