Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Moss\s+rear\s+seal\s+kit\s+seals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Moss\s+rear\s+seal\s+kit\s+seals\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Moss rear seal kit seals (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Ormrod" <Douglas.Ormrod@neurological.org.nz>; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:53:47 +1300; Hi T Listers Having finally got the car out of the garage after 7 years and had a few trips round the block (all went very well) I now have the engine out because the bl..dy Moss rear seal conversion; /html/mg-t/2006-12/msg00008.html (7,793 bytes)
2. Re: Moss rear seal kit seals (score: 1): Author: "lawrie" <lawrie@britcars.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:47:42 -0800; A problem was discovered with the original seals - of the type you removed. Apparently, the rubber was incompatible with the high revolutions of the engine. The new seals are designed for high-speed; /html/mg-t/2006-12/msg00009.html (8,343 bytes)
3. RE: Moss rear seal kit seals (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Ormrod" <Douglas.Ormrod@neurological.org.nz>; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:30:10 +1300; Hi T guys FYI, I got the following response from Moss re the different seal I received to replace the one I got three years ago. "... Most of the answer to your question is on page 7 of the latest MG; /html/mg-t/2006-12/msg00010.html (9,160 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]