Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Let\'s\s+compare\s+the\s+Type\-R\s+and\s+the\s+M3\s+for\s+fun\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Let\'s\s+compare\s+the\s+Type\-R\s+and\s+the\s+M3\s+for\s+fun\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Let's compare the Type-R and the M3 for fun! (score: 1): Author: Scott Johnson <sjohnson@kcnet.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:08:09 -0600 (EST); 87-91 M3 (AS) Type-R (GS) Engine DOHC 16v inline 4 Displacement 2302cc 1797cc HP @ RPM 192 @ 6750 195 @ 8000 Torque @ RPM 170 @ 4750 130 @ 7500 Wheelbase 101.0in 101.2in Curb Weight 2965lbs. 2595 lbs; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00641.html (7,669 bytes)
2. Re: Let's compare the Type-R and the M3 for fun! (score: 1): Author: "Jeffrey Lloyd" <jslz3@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:03:09 PST; I agree, The old ///M 3 is WAY out classed in AS Lets move it to GS like the Type-R :-) but seriously How does BS sound? with the rest of the BMW sedans (new m3 not included) those numbers are very c; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00645.html (8,484 bytes)
3. Re: Let's compare the Type-R and the M3 for fun! (score: 1): Author: Michael Piera <Tesec@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:36:57 -0500; I have intimate knowledge of the potential of the old M3, with Russ Wiles driving (as do many of the old timers from the year he destroyed CS). Back in '91, Russ drove all the way to Connecticut for; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00718.html (8,629 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]