Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*JC\s+$just\s+curious$\s+\"the\s+car\s+is\s+origional\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*JC\s+$just\s+curious$\s+\"the\s+car\s+is\s+origional\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. JC (just curious) "the car is origional" (score: 1): Author: "Robert J. Simmons" <rsimmons2@home.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:47:34 -0500; Hi list As I said I'm curious about the latest roadster on Ebay. (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/aw-cgi/ebayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=441913826&r=0&t=0 The roadster seems to have '70 lights according t; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00632.html (7,459 bytes)
2. Re: JC (just curious) "the car is origional" (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Murphy" <solex67@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:06:34 PDT; I saw this car too. It does appear to be a 68 with 70 side markers. Probably at some point in its life it had some work done and the fenders were replaced and the side lights put on. VIN tells the ta; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00633.html (8,378 bytes)
3. Re: JC (just curious) "the car is origional" (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Walter" <ra0618@email.sps.mot.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 12:19:15 -0500; VIN number and the rest of the details are '68 2000. Rear license light on the bumper is correct for '68, too. The front turn signal and rear reflectors are different for a '70 (unique items to that; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00634.html (7,987 bytes)
4. Re: JC (just curious) "the car is origional" (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 19:57:27 -0400; Rear resonator is wrong too. But I'm nit picking. (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/aw-cgi/ebayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=441913826 &r=0&t=0; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00640.html (7,815 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]