Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Costs\s+of\s+running\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Costs\s+of\s+running\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Costs of running (score: 1): Author: Carl Flippin <carlf@perite.org>; Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 17:57:03 -0700; Hi all, I'm new to this list but I have a question. My sister is very interested in getting a Datsun 2000 and I'm wondering: Do any of you use a 2000 as a daily driver? How appropriate is it as a dai; /html/datsun-roadsters/2004-05/msg00032.html (6,973 bytes)
2. RE: Costs of running (score: 1): Author: "Rourke, Brian" <brian.rourke@hp.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 11:22:19 +1000; The cost of running a 2000?? Is it a sloex or SU model. That can make a difference. Solex "generally" use a little more fuel and you have the large sump to fill each oil change. My 1970 solex car doe; /html/datsun-roadsters/2004-05/msg00033.html (8,434 bytes)
3. RE: Costs of running (score: 1): Author: "Todd Barker" <barkert@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 20:55:19 -0700; I used my 1600 with a 2 liter solex for many years as a daily driver. My experience shows that once the parts such as the alternator, regulator, and master cylinders are replaced, the daily reliabil; /html/datsun-roadsters/2004-05/msg00045.html (7,528 bytes)
4. Re: Costs of running (score: 1): Author: "Dave Stoll" <dgstoll@gwi.net>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 19:47:24 -0400; You may be better off getting a 1600 for daily driving, avoiding the overhead cam stuff.. daveS interested daily; /html/datsun-roadsters/2004-05/msg00051.html (7,254 bytes)
5. Re: Costs of running (score: 1): Author: Marc&Heidi <mtyler@hctc.net>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 20:56:40 -0500; /html/datsun-roadsters/2004-05/msg00055.html (6,918 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]