Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Carburetor\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: AAFS172@aol.com
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 23:12:34 EST
Does anybody know how many CFM's the '75 two barrel carb is rated for? I want to put a four barrel on but I don't want to go to big. I'm considering 390 CFM to 500 CFM Holley four barrel carbs. Greg
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00027.html (7,230 bytes)

2. Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: Bricklins2048@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 00:24:50 EST
I put a 600, or is it a 650 CFM Holley four barrel carb on mine along with a midrise intake. I can send photos if you like Larry Las Vegas, NV /// /// bricklin@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00028.html (7,253 bytes)

3. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: AAFS172@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:37:38 EST
I put a 600, or is it a 650 CFM Holley four barrel carb on mine along with a midrise intake. I can send photos if you like Larry Las Vegas, NV Thanks for the info. But I have some engine building sof
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00029.html (8,575 bytes)

4. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: AAFS172@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:25:41 EST
Sorry but I don't agree with that. Amount of CFM required depends on horse power, cam profile and engine volumetric efficiency, which can vary greatly between stock and modified engines. Over carbure
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00030.html (7,901 bytes)

5. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "Owen Evans" <tybach@adan.kingston.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 15:06:39 -0500
Greg, the recommended (by Ford, Holley and any other reputable carb maker) 4 barrel carb for the 351W is 600-650 CFM. Sizing the carburetor is based on air flow in CFM at wide open throttle. It is a
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00031.html (8,827 bytes)

6. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: Jason p Mcclure <jasonbrick@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 15:01:30 -0800
The Edelbrock Performer 4V manifold,and Performer electric choke 650 cfm carb would be perfect /// /// bricklin@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool ///
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00032.html (7,357 bytes)

7. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "Seth" <sbunin@provide.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 19:15:03 -0500
Give that man the prize. I couldn't have explained it any better. But I might with trying to set the redline on my brick at 6000 (I'm thinking 5200 would be about as wound out as I'd want to go. Also
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00033.html (9,650 bytes)

8. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Coleman" <colemaal@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:39:55
Here is a deal for someone looking for a trailer hitch for their Bricklin that will also benefit BI. I am having my old garage torn down and a larger one built. Consequently, I am rushing to get my B
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00034.html (8,922 bytes)

9. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "Owen Evans" <tybach@adan.kingston.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:11:05 -0500
Greg, very embarrased about my last diatribe on the subject for using 451 instead of 351 in the calculations. The approach was right but I can't find my Holley book so I did everything from memory. I
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00035.html (8,133 bytes)

10. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: AAFS172@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:34:37 EST
Thanks for all the info so far. This is great stuff and I'm having alot of fun with it. I ran some numbers through my software and this is what I came up with. I'll speak in terms of torque since tha
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00036.html (8,511 bytes)

11. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <wingracer@email.msn.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:12:52 -0500
It mildly CFM. == Hmm, it's a 351in^3, ergo ~609cfm. As for using 6krpm, 5k is more reasonable for this stocker, or ~508cfm. == produce == ~487cfm, or more realistically for this stocker, 406cfm if
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00037.html (9,788 bytes)

12. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "Owen Evans" <tybach@adan.kingston.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:45:03 -0500
Seth, balancing the engine doesn't mean you use it anymore than you actually use 650 CFM. What it does is give you a lot of driving flexability, particularly with a manual transmission (which I am fi
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00038.html (8,770 bytes)

13. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <wingracer@email.msn.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:58:01 -0500
Hmm, my previous response doesn't factor in an aftermarket exhaust. With a free flow exhaust, I'd increase the cfm to 650, which IIRC has the same 1-3/8" primaries as the 500cfm 2bbl. Yes, torque spi
/html/bricklin/2001-12/msg00039.html (10,073 bytes)

14. Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: Todd Rapp <rappman@marz.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 23:12:14 -0500
I have a 75 with the original carburetor. I have seen that many people have had problems with the stock carb. I didn't really pay that much attention a few months ago when there were several discussi
/html/bricklin/2000-05/msg00113.html (6,828 bytes)

15. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "High Tech Coatings" <htc@MNSi.Net>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 06:03:26 -0400
You can make a 4 bbl carb fit with an adapter but it will provide no better performance than the 2 bbl, probably with less driveability. I believe you have three choices: A) fix/rebuild stock carb. B
/html/bricklin/2000-05/msg00115.html (7,626 bytes)

16. Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: Todd Rapp <rappman@marz.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:27:23 -0600
I finally got sick of the original carb with its sticking choke and flooding problem. I bought a Holley 4150 600cfm with manual choke on ebay for $61.00. The carb is only about 1 1/2 years old and ca
/html/bricklin/2000-02/msg00132.html (6,662 bytes)

17. Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: Isensee@aol.com
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 21:50:02 EDT
Just got the latest Brickline. Nice job, John. There is an article in it listing things that should be done to maintain and improve our Bricklins. One is to replace the carburetor with a Holly. Has a
/html/bricklin/1999-04/msg00056.html (6,943 bytes)

18. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Blair" <jblair@exis.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 22:10:15 -0400
Scott, I can't speak from experience yet, but it supposedly makes a good bit of difference both in performance and mileage. And thanks for the comments on the April issue. I received my bulk shipment
/html/bricklin/1999-04/msg00058.html (7,753 bytes)

19. Fw: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 02:07:45 -0400
I wasn't pleased with mine, and neither were a number of owners early on. I Holly 0-4412 2bbl with separate electric choke kit 85R-5175 (you have to assemble) on mine many years ago. It's ~direct rep
/html/bricklin/1999-04/msg00065.html (7,809 bytes)

20. Re: Carburetor (score: 1)
Author: "George Schiro" <gschiro@lni.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 05:13:59 -0400
My 74 came with a Carter AFB. When I had the car on the road, it drove quite well, though I didn't check the mileage. By the way, the red line on my tach is set for 6000. Is this correct for a stock
/html/bricklin/1999-04/msg00066.html (6,944 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu