Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Brakes\s+without\s+booster\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Brakes\s+without\s+booster\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Brakes without booster (score: 1): Author: CE25593@aol.com; Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 20:29:34 EDT; Hi all. I am looking for recommendations, suggestions, etc. regarding the best way to get good braking without using the booster. I intend to keep the stock front disk and drum rear brakes. I also wa; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00084.html (7,390 bytes)
2. RE: Brakes without booster (score: 1): Author: "ron fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>; Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:56:42 -0400; Doug Jennings of Tiger Auto in Ohio was selling a kit with master cylinder and the 2 rear brake cylinders. He states that they are sized to work without the booster. I do not know the price. Tiger A; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00085.html (8,882 bytes)
3. Re: Brakes without booster (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 10:54:56 -0700; Bob, one of the easiest ways is to get better brake pads. Stock pads have a Cd of around .25-.30. I use Porterfield R4-S pads with a Cd of .40. Here is the formula. T=R*A*F*N *P T=total system torque; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00089.html (8,496 bytes)
4. Re: Brakes without booster (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:13:15 EDT; I recently switched from a stock master cylinder to a smaller diameter. I believe the new one is 0.75" and I think was standard in the early Alpines. The one I got had to have the push rod modified; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00090.html (7,587 bytes)
5. Re: Brakes without booster (score: 1): Author: VegasLegal@aol.com; Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:57:48 -0400; Can't help you overall, but did do something interesting that other posters might look to. My booster is out while I am doing a driving restoration. It is at the bottom of the list for the redo. In t; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00098.html (7,668 bytes)
6. Re: Brakes without booster (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:07:34 -0700; CAt sells them as emergency booster bypass hoses...I have one in my console just waiting to be used. But then I put on a different booster a big 7 inch diameter one. Doubled the stoipping power of th; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00099.html (8,267 bytes)
7. Re: Brakes without booster (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:05:39 EDT; Get the Jennings brake parts. The parts he supplies work well and the larger rear cylinders make the rear brakes useful. You will have to adjust rear brakes more often to reduce pedal travel. John L; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00102.html (7,266 bytes)
8. Re: Brakes without booster (score: 1): Author: VegasLegal@aol.com; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:07:02 -0400; A number of people wrote back to an earlier post I made relative to the part number for the bypass hose for the booster. I am sorry, but with getting the car running the first priority after 17 years; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00119.html (7,742 bytes)
9. Re: Brakes without booster (score: 1): Author: VegasLegal@aol.com; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 21:07:40 -0400; Dear List: I got a private correspondence referencing the brake bypass hose from Autozone that indicated that the flanging may be inappropriate on that piece. The concern was that a bubble vs double; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00122.html (7,721 bytes)
10. Re: Brakes without booster (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:51:30 -0700; I believe that the method you used could indeed have deformed and crushed the original "bubble flare", which looks something like this ==<> to "more, or less" conform with your US "double flare", wh; /html/tigers/2003-08/msg00143.html (9,524 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]