Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Appearances\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Appearances\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Appearances (score: 1): Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 11:40:30 -0400; <<<Now if only I can talk the SCAC into buying into the Best of Breed approach... Two classes with Miatas that look identical? Two with Celicas? Neons? CRX's? Nonsense. This is the Sports Car Club of; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00730.html (7,462 bytes)
2. Re: Appearances (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 12:56:56 EDT; << I have an idea. Let's eliminate CM because they look like BM cars. Well, I've always wanted to run with a 2 liter engine ... But, of course I wanted it in the back of my FF, and I wanted it to som; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00745.html (7,683 bytes)
3. Re: Appearances (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 13:02:39 -0400; Heh. :-) (Of course, CM cars have no wings, and BM cars do.) Seriously, I think it's detrimental to the sport to have two of nine Stock classes dominated (in terms of numbers, if not performance) by; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00746.html (7,632 bytes)
4. Re: Appearances (score: 1): Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 13:19:16 -0400; I agree but I still think the cars should be classed based on relative differences. To me, the 1.6 is different enough from the 1.8 to be considered separately. But if moving the 1.6 Miata to CS wil; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00749.html (7,183 bytes)
5. RE: Appearances (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 12:19:15 -0500; Seriously, I think it's detrimental to the sport to have two of nine Stock classes dominated (in terms of numbers, if not performance) by Miatas (and earlier, Neons). == HEY!!! There was a non-Neon c; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00750.html (7,483 bytes)
6. Re: Appearances (score: 1): Author: Mari L Clements <mrndr2@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 13:35:02 -0700; It's already been done, and so far, so good. A few national trophies have gone to the 1.6, but the MR2 and 924S are still holding their own against the 1.6 Miata. There are certainly courses in whic; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00753.html (7,455 bytes)
7. Re: Appearances (score: 1): Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:33:26 -0700; Near as I can tell, it hasn't created an overdog situation yet. 1.6L Miatas are fairly close to 2nd-gen MR2's in Solo2, but a lot of this is course-dependent. MR2's work better on "point-and-squirt"; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00786.html (8,351 bytes)
8. Re: Appearances (score: 1): Author: Hottvr@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:41:35 EDT; << So I guess I'd be against it if this is the only way I can get 'the Big Block option' most of the other cars like mine originally came with. Bruce You can run a "Big Block" if you want??? Its just; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00804.html (7,481 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]