Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+couple\s+basic\s+questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+couple\s+basic\s+questions\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: Chuck Pedretti <chuckp@magenic.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:16:38 -0500; Finally started working on my wifes new 70 MK3 spitfire this weekend. Took it for a little drive in between snow showers to test it out. A couple problems poped up. A leaky rear wheel cylinder result; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00019.html (8,042 bytes)
2. RE: A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: Chris De Wet <DeWetC1@sapo.co.za>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 16:05:40 +0200; I had a quick look at the pictures and the lights you mention do not appear original . Sorry . I'm not really familiar with US spec Spitfires , but AFAIK , there should be two sets of small round li; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00024.html (9,088 bytes)
3. RE: A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: Chuck Pedretti <chuckp@magenic.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:10:06 -0500; A 70 is different than most MK3's, special in many weird ways, the lights are supposed to be there, and the backup light is integrated into the licence plate holder. The only thing I havn't been able; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00025.html (9,703 bytes)
4. RE: A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: Chuck Pedretti <chuckp@magenic.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:22:04 -0500; Goofy things on 1970 MK3 Spitfires (These are on mine, many changes were made throughout 1970, some are not on mine) 1) Special Hubcaps (Just try finding replacements!) 2) Backup light is in the lice; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00026.html (9,824 bytes)
5. RE: A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: M D Nugent <carcentric@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:13:30 -0700 (PDT); I had a 1970 when new and I think the inner two round "lights" were actually reflectors - probably in response to a US DOT requirement for more reflective surface (in square inches) than the flat par; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00029.html (8,678 bytes)
6. Re: A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:39:24 -0700; Hi Chuck, I saw this car being sold on eBay. Congratulations. Your car should in fact, have the dual line brake circuit already. Those began in mid to late 1967 on the Mk3 line. Your tail lights are; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00032.html (9,964 bytes)
7. RE: A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: Chuck Pedretti <chuckp@magenic.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:51:53 -0500; Are you sure about the MC, I'm pretty sure that it is only a single chamber? There is a distribution block mounted next to the MC which takes the one line from the MC and splits it, one to each front; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00033.html (10,705 bytes)
8. RE: A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: "Stephane St-Amant" <steph71tr6@crosswinds.net>; Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 11:55:21 -0500; Just a guess here but I would think that the your red inner round lens are extra reflectors to conform to the US regulation (kind of like the extra ones, although rectangle, that they added to the '7; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00034.html (11,124 bytes)
9. RE: A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: Chuck Pedretti <chuckp@magenic.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:56:48 -0500; Looking at the spitbits catalog, the dual MC is definitely what I have. I'm going to have to take a long look at the brake system tonight. The MC is not leaking as far as I can tell - there is no new; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00035.html (7,884 bytes)
10. RE: A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: M D Nugent <carcentric@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:08:52 -0700 (PDT); Excellent pictures - they show the flatness of the round reflectors I was mentioning. None of the aftermarket catalogs even list them! The URL, though, is http://cars.motorcities.com/contents/00B9L11; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00037.html (11,482 bytes)
11. RE: A couple basic questions (score: 1): Author: Chris De Wet <DeWetC1@sapo.co.za>; Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:35:24 +0200; Sorry Chuck , like I said I'm not very familiar with US spec Spitfires nor with Mk 3 or later versions . I tend to stick with Mk 1's and 2's .:-) Don't have my Spitfire & GT 6 Guide to Originality he; /html/spitfires/2001-04/msg00079.html (8,708 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]