Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3\.9\s+pistons\s+\-\s+possible\s+Ford\s+candidates\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3\.9\s+pistons\s+\-\s+possible\s+Ford\s+candidates\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 3.9 pistons - possible Ford candidates (score: 1): Author: "Carl Floyd" <cmfloyd@chartertn.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:50:23 -0400; For Keith W., Gleen T., etc... I have been looking a possible Ford pistons that could be used in place of the 3.9 Rover slugs. The numbers are Silv-O-lite part numbers. Some look real interesting at; /html/mgb-v8/2005-04/msg00048.html (7,908 bytes)
2. Re: 3.9 pistons - possible Ford candidates (score: 1): Author: Alan Morris <klatka@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:55:42 -0700 (GMT-07:00); I'm currently using the silvolite 1120 +.020 in my stroker with the standard length rods, wth the 1.500 compression height, a composite head gasket, and the small chamber heads compression ratio will; /html/mgb-v8/2005-04/msg00049.html (8,236 bytes)
3. Re: 3.9 pistons - possible Ford candidates (score: 1): Author: "Carl Floyd" <cmfloyd@chartertn.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:27:48 -0400; That you use this piston for a stroker app. makes me wonder how it could possibly work with a stock stroke. I would think that piston would be too far down in the cylinder for my use. Did you receiv; /html/mgb-v8/2005-04/msg00051.html (9,156 bytes)
4. Re: 3.9 pistons - possible Ford candidates (score: 1): Author: "Carl Floyd" <cmfloyd@chartertn.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:45:46 -0400; <<Let me look at the information I collected before ording my pistons. I believe that the compression height is the wrist pin to piston top height. The 1120 piston is dished, and has the lowest comp; /html/mgb-v8/2005-04/msg00053.html (8,253 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]