Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Making\s+laser\s+reflectors\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Making\s+laser\s+reflectors\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [evolution-disc.] Making laser reflectors... (score: 1): Author: Travis Dixon <travisd@tubas.net>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 12:21:09 -0400 (EDT); I'm in the process of refurbing our JAC laser heads as well - let me know what you find out. One thing that comes to mind for me though - I would not be inclined to make the heads and reflectors any; /html/autox/2004-05/msg00184.html (8,837 bytes)
2. RE: [evolution-disc.] Making laser reflectors... (score: 1): Author: "Woody Rogers" <Woody@tirerack.com>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 13:46:00 -0500; I have found Banner Engineering a good source of quality reflectors for our timing gear. http://www.buybanneronline.com/cgi-bin/eris.cgi?wwizmstr=WEB.ACC.PRODUCT &sel=afperf John "Woody" Rogers Produ; /html/autox/2004-05/msg00185.html (9,066 bytes)
3. RE: [evolution-disc.] Making laser reflectors... (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 15:27:41 -0400 (EDT); Looks good! What reflectivity factor are people using? Do I want to go with something like a BRT-92x92 (reflectivity of 3.0)? Or is the reflectivity mostly just influenced by the size of the target?; /html/autox/2004-05/msg00186.html (7,681 bytes)
4. RE: [evolution-disc.] Making laser reflectors... (score: 1): Author: "Woody Rogers" <Woody@tirerack.com>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 15:23:00 -0500; I believe higher is better, as you would expect. Don't forget to consider the worst case scenario your gear will see - rain + wind (small droplets that refract the laser light, but aren't large enoug; /html/autox/2004-05/msg00187.html (8,568 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]