Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+U\-Joint\s+Removal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+U\-Joint\s+Removal\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TR] U-Joint Removal (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:22:38 -0800; It does work for me after seeing John Kipping demonstrate it at VTR/SP, but I wouldn't call it "tapping" nor use a "regular" hammer. It's more like some pretty stout blows with a BFH (I used a 2.5 l; /html/triumphs/2008-01/msg00347.html (7,551 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] U-Joint Removal (score: 1): Author: Michael Lang <mlang99@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:28:31 -0800; --==0247280584== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob, I have always pressed them in and out using a pair of sockets. Choose a small enough socket to pas; /html/triumphs/2008-01/msg00349.html (8,897 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] U-Joint Removal (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:28:21 EST; It does work for me after seeing John Kipping demonstrate it at VTR/SP, but I wouldn't call it "tapping" nor use a "regular" hammer. It's more like some pretty stout blows with a BFH (I used a 2.5 lb; /html/triumphs/2008-01/msg00350.html (8,267 bytes)
4. Re: [TR] U-Joint Removal (score: 1): Author: Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:19:05 -0500; Like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDX17xf9grA Jeff Scarbrough 75 TR6 x 1, 76 1500 x 2, 78 1500 x 1, 80 1500 x 0.5 http://www.fishplate.org/vehicles/spitfire/ Athens, Georgia #354 -- Version:; /html/triumphs/2008-01/msg00354.html (7,930 bytes)
5. Re: [TR] U-Joint Removal (score: 1): Author: tom white <tswhitez123@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:07:39 +0000; Put the yoke in a vise with a socket the same diameter as the u-joint cap between the cap and the vise jaw. IF both caps are in place put another socket the diameter of the ypke housing on the other; /html/triumphs/2008-01/msg00357.html (7,757 bytes)
6. Re: [TR] U-Joint Removal (score: 1): Author: "Bob Danielson" <75TR6@tr6.danielsonfamily.org>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:31:29 -0500; --==2132149119== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jeff, Great video....a picture really is worth a thousand words. I just spent about an hour getting t; /html/triumphs/2008-01/msg00363.html (9,928 bytes)
7. Re: [TR] U-Joint Removal (score: 1): Author: pethier@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:24:52 +0000; Once you get the pressure on, if the cap is resistant, tap on the side with a brass hammer. The small shock is usually enough to break loose a cap already under pressure. -- Phil Ethier West Side Sai; /html/triumphs/2008-01/msg00369.html (8,056 bytes)
8. Re: [TR] U-Joint Removal (score: 1): Author: "Nolan" <foxtrapper@aceweb.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:38:47 -0500; Huh, I watched him do it with almost dainty raps with a small hammer. BFH's and presses do have the nasty habit of bending things. Many a part gets accidentally mangled beyond use by a press. -- Orig; /html/triumphs/2008-01/msg00378.html (7,862 bytes)
9. [TR] U-Joint Removal (score: 1): Author: banc8004@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:52:13 +0000; Avoiding damage to the yoke is the reason the hammer method is the preferred Pressing a stubborn hardy-spicer out with a vice, or drifting it out using a socket, can put damaging stress on the arms o; /html/triumphs/2008-01/msg00386.html (8,152 bytes)
10. Re: [TR] U-Joint Removal (score: 1): Author: Bill & AnnaBelle <anabil007@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:32:07 -0800; OR ... you can take Clint Eastwoods advice and remember that "A mans' gotta know his limitations" ... and take the thing to your local drive line shop and have them do it ... I replaced all the U-Joi; /html/triumphs/2008-01/msg00387.html (8,259 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]