Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+Best\s+SHO\s+$was\s+Global\s+Warming$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+Best\s+SHO\s+$was\s+Global\s+Warming$\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: "Mark Mucher" <mmucher@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:24:06 -0400; I'd tend to agree - esp the white Plus. (OF course the '89s were the fastest, and unburdened by those pesky ABS brakes and air bags.) mm in sunny FL I have always felt that way about 91's. Especially; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00153.html (9,077 bytes)
2. Re: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: "Adam Parrott" <parrotta@usa.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 22:41:03 -0500; The '89 B9Bx program also commanded an average of 6 degrees more spark advance than did it's younger '92-'95 X2J brother, which might account for some of the '89 SHO's added "quickness" over it's you; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00159.html (9,576 bytes)
3. Re: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: Mark Nunnally <marknunnally@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 23:47:53 -0400; I've never seen that. When you say "B9Bx", you mean B9B or B9B1 (the CA/EGR one I think?) Got a screen grab chart of such for a comparo? _______________________________________________ Shotimes maili; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00160.html (10,615 bytes)
4. Re: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: "Adam Parrott" <parrotta@usa.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 23:22:11 -0500; While both B9B calibrations (B9B and B9B1) command more overall spark than the X2J, I was actually referring specifically to the 49-state '89 B9B program in my post. Adam I've never seen that. When y; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00161.html (10,423 bytes)
5. RE: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: Rich Bruso <shoguy_89@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 21:57:50 -0700; Any '89 made after January is an abomination unto..well, someone. Or something. Okay, the religious angle isn't well thought out, but... -- -Rich Bruso 89 Black (Lola) 89 Silver (parts) Sierra Vista,; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00163.html (8,383 bytes)
6. RE: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: "Mark Mucher" <mmucher@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 06:44:58 -0400; Mine is a December car - I didn't know there was a difference except "Premium Fuel Required" (mine) What else? Thanks, mm in sunny FL Any '89 made after January is an abomination unto..well, someone.; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00166.html (9,015 bytes)
7. RE: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: "Dave Kegel" <d.kegel@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 08:28:05 -0500; Later Gen1s also used the B9B 'puter. I assume this applies to them as well? This would certainly make it easier for the X2J cars to run on lower octane fuel than the earlier cars. Dave The '89 B9Bx; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00170.html (10,280 bytes)
8. RE: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: Rich Bruso <shoguy_89@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 7:12:01 -0700; Early '89 cars had chrome strips on the interior door panels (Hey, they were in the parts bin) There were also minor changes to the under-hood insulation. I have two different panels from two 11/88 c; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00171.html (10,458 bytes)
9. RE: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:36:34 -0400; Must have been sprinkled through the model run with this stuff. My '89 was a 1/89 car. It had the chrome strip, and never has needed a heater core (at least up until this past October AFAIK). Ron Por; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00175.html (11,118 bytes)
10. Re: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: "D. Mallinson" <dmall@mwonline.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:42:20 -0500; I don't understand where that comment comes from. Atlanta Assembly has won numerous awards for quality and low defects, plus efficiency over the years. The plant is closing later this year, and it wi; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00176.html (8,443 bytes)
11. Re: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: "D. Mallinson" <dmall@mwonline.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 10:43:16 -0500; Nope, it will be torn down for some housing or retail project. (Can't remember which) Land is too expensive to be a plant anymore! Don _______________________________________________ Shotimes mailing; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00181.html (8,579 bytes)
12. Re: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: "Adam Parrott" <parrotta@usa.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:24:09 -0500; Actually, I need to correct myself. :-x Upon further research, I have discovered that I accidentally referenced Superchip-based B9B and B9B1 images (which command more spark than factory) in my origi; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00196.html (9,754 bytes)
13. RE: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1): Author: "Dave Kegel" <d.kegel@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:45:25 -0500; Hey, I've been saying that for years (admittedly without any facts). :) Dave Once I obtained the correct factory binaries, I was able to confirm that there are ZERO differences in the spark programmi; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00197.html (8,448 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]