Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+running\s+ethernet\s+wires\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+running\s+ethernet\s+wires\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:18:50 -0400 (EDT); I need a higher speed network connection from my office (where my 'server' pc lives) to the living room (where my PS3 lives) to stream video, etc. Is there anything magical or to watch out for in te; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00024.html (8,626 bytes)
2. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Steven Trovato <strovato@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:31:14 -0400; I have done this and it is basically what you said, buy cable connectors, crimper, etc. It's not brain surgery, but it does pay to be careful to make reliable connections. I found this site useful re; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00025.html (10,019 bytes)
3. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Steven Trovato <strovato@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:34:02 -0400; I have done this and it is basically what you said, buy cable connectors, crimper, etc. It's not brain surgery, but it does pay to be careful to make reliable connections. I found this site useful re; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00026.html (9,207 bytes)
4. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Chris Kantarjiev <cak@dimebank.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:34:24 -0700 (PDT); You'll find CAT 5E or CAT 6 cable, and either one is good for up to gigabit speeds with no problem. If you're running jack-to-jack, just follow the color codes on the jack - make sure that you choose; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00027.html (8,599 bytes)
5. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: PJ McGarvey <pj_mcgarvey@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:40:49 -0400; I just bought pair of rj-45 jacks and wall plates from HD for about $4 for jacks and maybe $2 for the wall plates. You need to strip back and "punch down" the individual wires, which I have not done; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00028.html (10,670 bytes)
6. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: David Hillman <hillman@planet-torque.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:46:12 -0400 (EDT); Unless you only have, and exclusively use, desktop machines in specific locations... go wireless. It's so much easier to just have a couple laptops, and wireless everywhere in the house. The cable yo; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00029.html (9,435 bytes)
7. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Wayne <wmc_st@xxiii.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:48:52 -0400; Don't run the cables too close to AC lines, esp for long runs in close parallel, or near fluorescents. Keeping a distance and running perpendicular is best. There is a minimum bend radius for etherne; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00030.html (10,881 bytes)
8. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: John Miller <jem@milleredp.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:58:17 -0700; No. They're fine for the wire, and I think HD at least stocks Leviton connectors which are fine, but you don't CRIMP anything, you need a *good* 110 punchdown tool. Cat5E wire is good enough, Cat6 b; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00031.html (9,269 bytes)
9. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:59:10 -0700; Note that the instructions on that site gloss over the color code at the plugs. For 3 of the 4 pairs, the white/tracer wire goes next to its matching color wire. But there is a pair that should be s; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00032.html (10,140 bytes)
10. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: mike rambour <mikey@b2systems.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:59:17 -0700; Pretty standard stuff (for some of us at least). I would look into Cat6 wiring, it is NOT used yet but its the future and if I was going to wire my house I would plan for the future. The wiring work; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00033.html (12,038 bytes)
11. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Chris Kantarjiev <cak@dimebank.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:03:02 -0700 (PDT); Um, just to be clear ... you talked about using a crimping tool. Are you planning to make long patch cables - with male RJ45s at each end - or mount wall plates? I'd really recommend wall plates if y; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00034.html (9,628 bytes)
12. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: David Scheidt <dmscheidt@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:07:42 -0400; If you're doing fixed wiring, with jacks in wall plates, this is a reasonable way to go. (Though you'll pay a substantial premium for buying from the Borg.) If what you're planning on doing is runnin; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00035.html (10,918 bytes)
13. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: mike rambour <mikey@b2systems.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:11:41 -0700; That cheap little punch tool works just fine, did not mess up a single connection :) Wireless is neat and easy. But I prefer the speed of a wired connection and my garage is detached, wireless was no; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00036.html (10,126 bytes)
14. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Wayne <wmc_st@xxiii.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:13:54 -0400; I'm still not a fan of wireless. It's fast enough for web surfing (ie: faster than your internet connection) but slow for bulk things, like transferring that entire video file between machines, or do; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00037.html (10,282 bytes)
15. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Chris Kantarjiev <cak@dimebank.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:28:20 -0700 (PDT); Right - this is the nice thing about A, you can plug an RJ11 into the RJ45 and it will just work. _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Sho; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00038.html (9,193 bytes)
16. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:10:29 -0400 (EDT); Speed is the problem. 100Mb or 1Gb wired connection vs. 54Mb wireless (best case, which isn't the case with my existing setup). Mark _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00039.html (9,355 bytes)
17. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:17:12 -0700; I'm pretty sure the same thing holds for B. Phones don't care about pairing nearly as much as Ethernet does; and the pairing is the only difference between 568A and 568B. Randall ___________________; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00040.html (8,910 bytes)
18. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:25:40 -0400 (EDT); Thanks for the advice so far. So it sounds like I want CAT 5e minimum, along with wall mounts with punch down connections on the jacks? I'll use store bought patch cables to go from the wall to the; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00041.html (9,635 bytes)
19. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: David Hillman <hillman@planet-torque.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:30:19 -0400 (EDT); I won't turn this into a debate, but for the record, I watched most of the NCAA tournament streamed wirelessly to my laptop. The TV-quality video never paused to buffer. YMMV. Also, my LAN never goes; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00042.html (9,953 bytes)
20. Re: [Shop-talk] running ethernet wires (score: 1): Author: Wayne <wmc_st@xxiii.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:53:30 -0400; Correct. Both 568A & 568B, as applied to modular connector wiring, only swap the 2nd & 3rd pairs (orange & green) around. Both configurations are electrically identical, with "straight through" wirin; /html/shop-talk/2009-04/msg00043.html (9,122 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]