Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Mgb\-v8\]\s+Holley\s+vs\s+Edelbrock\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Mgb\-v8\]\s+Holley\s+vs\s+Edelbrock\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Mgb-v8] Holley vs Edelbrock (score: 1): Author: Barrie Robinson <barrie@look.ca>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:23:07 -0400; I have had an Edelbrock (Weber) 1404 carb on my 3.5L Rover V8 motor since day one. I have never got the engine running "sweetly" although I do have a mild cam. I have found a mechanic who understands; /html/mgb-v8/2010-04/msg00004.html (7,790 bytes)
2. Re: [Mgb-v8] Holley vs Edelbrock (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <larry@embreyfamily.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:18:40 -0700; Like many things in life you will find people tend to Be either A or B. Everyone has a preference, they can be based on fact, feeling, familiarity etc.. I have had both, however the Holley I had was; /html/mgb-v8/2010-04/msg00005.html (9,874 bytes)
3. Re: [Mgb-v8] Holley vs Edelbrock (score: 1): Author: Keith Grider <keith.grider@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:50:36 -0500; My experience is that people who say this have little experience with Carters/Edelbrocks. If all you do is idle and WOT, a Holley is great. Partial throttle is where the Carter shines, IMO. With a 's; /html/mgb-v8/2010-04/msg00006.html (9,241 bytes)
4. Re: [Mgb-v8] Holley vs Edelbrock (score: 1): Author: James Bown <jaguarsandrail@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 09:53:35 -0600; I have run both the Holley 390 and Edelbrock 500 on my 215 Buicks. I have also run both a Holley and Edelbrock (properly sized) on a Ford 351 in a boat. Also I have had Holleys and Edelbrocks (and lo; /html/mgb-v8/2010-05/msg00001.html (8,290 bytes)
5. Re: [Mgb-v8] Holley vs Edelbrock (score: 1): Author: Barrie Robinson <barrie@look.ca>; Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 12:14:15 -0400; It is as I had read in a few places. Holley for umph, Edel for smooth. But I found my Edel ran out of the box on my Rover 3.5l - maybe it is different a little bit to the 215. I did read that BL imp; /html/mgb-v8/2010-05/msg00003.html (9,662 bytes)
6. Re: [Mgb-v8] Holley vs Edelbrock (score: 1): Author: James Bown <jaguarsandrail@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 18:31:47 -0600; Well put, "Holley for umph, Edel for smooth". Usually the Edel, right out of the box, is way way too rich. Perhaps 'Kent changed the jets and rods? Jim, It is as I had read in a few places. Holley fo; /html/mgb-v8/2010-05/msg00004.html (9,804 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]