Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[British\-cars\]\s+\[Spits\]\s+Recalls\s+\&\s+Smart\s+Laws\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: Glen Wilson <rovercar@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:36:04 -0400
Mark, You have never come across to me as a "stupid" person, but your comment certainly is stupid, or perhaps just economically biased and insensitive. For many people, that $1050 for a first offense
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00015.html (8,243 bytes)

2. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: caws52803@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:29:28 -0400
I searched the web and cannot find any info on this law.? Would you please supply us with some valid info? Mark, You have never come across to me as a "stupid" person, but your comment certainly is s
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00016.html (8,997 bytes)

3. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: ARoman4047@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:36:28 EDT
Google up "traffic fees, Virginia" There's at least a write up in the Washington Post... Tony in NJ W.A.S.T.E. ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ______________________________________________
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00017.html (7,057 bytes)

4. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:25:49 -0700
Oddly enough, I had no trouble finding articles on the subject. Here's one http://tinyurl.com/2cp5hd I've felt for a long time that traffic fines were based more on the gov't insatiable appetite for
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00019.html (8,576 bytes)

5. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: Barrie Robinson <barrie@look.ca>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:05:53 -0400
Today we are so keen to regulate intelligence that it is becoming a stupid society. If someone bashes into a car from behind that person is not driving sensibly. One can hear the excuses "I did not t
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00023.html (10,691 bytes)

6. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:32:59 -0700
I agree entirely. Unfortunately, it's mandatory in every US state I've ever driven in. Whether there is any traffic present or not. My impression is that Virginia plans to do those, too. The news ar
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00028.html (8,951 bytes)

7. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: Marv James <Britcrs@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:24:03 -0700
I don't think turn signals should be considered "advisory" any more than brake signals (lights) are "advisory". Marv _______________________________________________ British-cars mailing list British-
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00029.html (9,655 bytes)

8. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: Glen Wilson <rovercar@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:36:39 -0400
If you've driven through Virginia on I-95, this is believable. There are some interchanges that are about 30 stories high that look like something from a science fiction book cover. I've seen a rash
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00030.html (9,294 bytes)

9. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: "Robin Berens" <rberens@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:58:36 -0700
_______________________________________________ British-cars mailing list British-cars@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/british-cars
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00031.html (10,117 bytes)

10. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Blair" <jblair1948@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:27:29 -0400
Yes. It is a supprise to most Virginians. But what's new. Legislature is always pulling some like this. The are new "Civil" penalties ranging from an additional $300 to $3,000 depending on the ticket
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00034.html (10,365 bytes)

11. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Blair" <jblair1948@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:30:51 -0400
Do a google search for: va traffic laws july 1 Here's the 1st link I found, it's for a local TV station: http://www.wvec.com/news/topstories/stories/wvec_top_062207_new_laws_july_1. 47123d5.html John
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00035.html (9,100 bytes)

12. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: Barrie Robinson <barrie@look.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:33:59 -0400
Regards Barrie Barrie Robinson (705) 721-9060 http://www.britishv8.org/MG/BarrieRobinson.htm _______________________________________________ British-cars mailing list British-cars@autox.team.net http
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00037.html (9,978 bytes)

13. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: "Nolan" <foxtrapper@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:21:26 -0400
Boy, I sure do! I turn on my turn signals to "advise" the people around me that I intend to turn or change lanes soon. The brake lights serve the same function. I'm "advising" the people behind me th
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00038.html (9,592 bytes)

14. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: Marvin James <britcrs@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:39:32 -0700
The point I was trying to make (poorly) was in reference to the advisory vs mandatory argument. Clearly they are both advisory but, IMHO, they should both be mandatory. Marv _________________________
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00039.html (10,237 bytes)

15. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:42:24 EDT
Why I've even been known to flash my brake lights several times before hitting the brakes just to hopefully get the attention of people in back of me. ____________________________________ Gee, I have
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00040.html (9,297 bytes)

16. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: "Ron L" <lherault@bu.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:40:28 -0400
Their function is to advise. Their use should be mandatory. Ron L --Original Message-- From: british-cars-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:british-cars-bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Marvin James
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00041.html (10,657 bytes)

17. Re: [British-cars] [Spits] Recalls & Smart Laws (score: 1)
Author: Marvin James <britcrs@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:11:27 -0700
Couldn't have said it better. Marv _______________________________________________ British-cars mailing list British-cars@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/british-cars
/html/british-cars/2007-06/msg00042.html (10,589 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu