- 1. Re: Survey again? (score: 1)
- Author: yale!harvard!ames!pyrthoth.pyramid.com!robbp@encore.encore.com (Rob Pryor)
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 91 09:49:30 -0800
- I still have the complete results from the last survey I did last year (May/ June time frame) and I was planning on conducting a new survey this summer. The reason I was going to wait a year is that
- /html/british-cars/1991-01/msg00070.html (8,088 bytes)
- 2. Re: A Healey by any other name (score: 1)
- Author: yale!harvard!ames!pyrthoth.pyramid.com!robbp@encore.encore.com (Rob Pryor)
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 91 09:51:46 -0800
- Mike, You will probably get a couple of answers to this question, but I will throw my $.02 in. It is from memory so where I'm not sure I've put "~" or "?". This gives just some of the highlights that
- /html/british-cars/1991-01/msg00146.html (9,447 bytes)
- 3. Re: Healeys (score: 1)
- Author: yale!harvard!ames!pyrthoth.pyramid.com!robbp@encore.encore.com (Rob Pryor)
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 91 09:55:47 -0800
- The rules for international rallying allowed competitors to use what ever KIND of carbs they wanted, but they had to keep the same NUMBER of carbs. Dual-throat side-draft Webers were the hot ticket
- /html/british-cars/1991-01/msg00170.html (7,550 bytes)
- 4. Re: MGC and Healey Mk.IV engines (was Big Healeys) (score: 1)
- Author: yale!harvard!ames!pyrthoth.pyramid.com!robbp@encore.encore.com (Rob Pryor)
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 91 09:33:34 -0800
- At the time, BMC was intent on badge-engineering everything it could. The MGC was also to be an Austin-Healey 3000 Mk.IV, replacing the AH 3000 Mk.III. The casting technology for the block of the "C
- /html/british-cars/1991-01/msg00171.html (8,128 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu