Mail Archive Search: <+from:gaoliver@joplin.att.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:gaoliver@joplin.att.com: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. TR3A - 1961 (score: 1): Author: gaoliver@joplin.att.com (G A Oliver); Date: 31 May 95 08:51:44 -0400; Help! I have a line on a 1961 TR3A, I don't know very much about the car, the current owner bought it 17 years ago from a friend to restore, but never did, and now wants to get rid of it. He said the; /html/triumphs/1995-05/msg00517.html (7,371 bytes)
2. 61 TR3A (score: 1): Author: gaoliver@joplin.att.com (G A Oliver); Date: 1 Jun 95 08:07:34 -0400; First, a BIG THANK YOU to all the folks that responded to my plea for help yesterday. The advice was great. I saw the car last night and it was not as respresented, though probably what most of you a; /html/triumphs/1995-06/msg00002.html (13,122 bytes)
3. Re: TR3A Long Reply Part 2 (score: 1): Author: gaoliver@joplin.att.com (G A Oliver); Date: 1 Jun 95 10:31:21 -0400; sure to post it on the list. There may be someone else interested. Rik, I agree. As a follow-up to my earlier message, and after reading John Wroclawski's message from yesterday again, I suspect inn; /html/triumphs/1995-06/msg00007.html (7,316 bytes)
4. Re: 61 TR3A (score: 1): Author: gaoliver@joplin.att.com (G A Oliver); Date: 2 Jun 95 21:34:28 -0400; This car sounds like an utter basket case, and I would avoid it. I have a very rough TR2 which has been gathering dust for many years, which was in considerably better condition than what you are des; /html/triumphs/1995-06/msg00026.html (8,904 bytes)
5. Re: 61 TR3A (score: 1): Author: gaoliver@joplin.att.com (G A Oliver); Date: 5 Jun 95 09:47:23 -0400; Thanks to everyone who responded to my request for guidance, sounds like the consensus it that the car should be restored. At this point I have no interest in the car, and like the rest of you, would; /html/triumphs/1995-06/msg00038.html (8,807 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]