Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*My\s+opinion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*My\s+opinion\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. My opinion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 06:25:24 -0700; <And, as I've pointed out before, TRF is owned by a genuine Triumph enthusiast (unlike their competition). Moss in particular has made no secret of the fact that they are shifting their focus to othe; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg00461.html (7,682 bytes)
2. Re: My opinion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:01:00 EDT; << <And, as I've pointed out before, TRF is owned by a genuine Triumph enthusiast (unlike their competition). Moss in particular has made no secret of the fact that they are shifting their focus to o; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg00462.html (7,513 bytes)
3. Fwd: My opinion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:57:28 EDT; i don't think randall was being negative about Moss.I just think he was trying to give a litttle support to TRF,who doesn,t not have as extensive product as Moss. TRF get parts almost exclusively for; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg00466.html (7,368 bytes)
4. RE: My opinion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:28:37 -0700; Just to be clear, I did not mean there was anything wrong with moving into other markets, or intend to be particularly knocking Moss. My point was simply that, to Moss, we are just an income stream; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg00468.html (8,720 bytes)
5. RE: My opinion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:42:41 -0700; Since you've brought that up, Peter, remember several years ago when I pointed out that Moss was listing the spin-on oil filter adapter as fitting TR2-4A, when in fact it does not fit TR2 and early; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg00469.html (6,855 bytes)
6. RE: My opinion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 01:30:39 +0200 (CEST); It could be they now supply the Mocal adapter, which comes with both fine and course thread spigots. I don't know, mine was supplied by RevingtonTR. Eric -- '57 TR3a TS23315L - black '76 Spit FH88257; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg00471.html (7,933 bytes)
7. RE: My opinion (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:37:45 -0700; It's not a matter of coarse vs fine threads ... the early bypass filter heads are quite a bit different internally than the later full-flow filter heads. Both are coarse threads, but the early heads; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg00473.html (7,118 bytes)
8. My opinion (score: 1): Author: "Peter Arakelian" <PeterAra@MSN.COM>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 06:25:24 -0700; <And, as I've pointed out before, TRF is owned by a genuine Triumph enthusiast (unlike their competition). Moss in particular has made no secret of the fact that they are shifting their focus to othe; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg01320.html (8,372 bytes)
9. Re: My opinion (score: 1): Author: ZinkZ10C@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:01:00 EDT; << <And, as I've pointed out before, TRF is owned by a genuine Triumph enthusiast (unlike their competition). Moss in particular has made no secret of the fact that they are shifting their focus to o; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg01321.html (8,353 bytes)
10. Fwd: My opinion (score: 1): Author: Footfrek@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:57:28 EDT; i don't think randall was being negative about Moss.I just think he was trying to give a litttle support to TRF,who doesn,t not have as extensive product as Moss. TRF get parts almost exclusively for; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg01325.html (8,200 bytes)
11. RE: My opinion (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:28:37 -0700; Just to be clear, I did not mean there was anything wrong with moving into other markets, or intend to be particularly knocking Moss. My point was simply that, to Moss, we are just an income stream; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg01327.html (9,620 bytes)
12. RE: My opinion (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:42:41 -0700; Since you've brought that up, Peter, remember several years ago when I pointed out that Moss was listing the spin-on oil filter adapter as fitting TR2-4A, when in fact it does not fit TR2 and early; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg01328.html (7,769 bytes)
13. RE: My opinion (score: 1): Author: "Eric K." <tr3a@xs4all.nl>; Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 01:30:39 +0200 (CEST); It could be they now supply the Mocal adapter, which comes with both fine and course thread spigots. I don't know, mine was supplied by RevingtonTR. Eric -- '57 TR3a TS23315L - black '76 Spit FH88257; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg01330.html (8,744 bytes)
14. RE: My opinion (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:37:45 -0700; It's not a matter of coarse vs fine threads ... the early bypass filter heads are quite a bit different internally than the later full-flow filter heads. Both are coarse threads, but the early heads; /html/triumphs/2004-06/msg01332.html (7,824 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]