- 1. Re: Left Lane Bandits (v.long, & no LBC) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
- First of all, thanks to everyone who has emailed me off list and expressed their thanks that I vented on this subject. Now on to Steven Newell's rant :-) choice, First off, if I wanted to drive 90 th
- /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg00362.html (12,282 bytes)
- 2. Re: Left Lane Bandits (v.long, & no LBC) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 16:40:04 -0600
- [WARNING: apology, some ranting, some reason :-) ] Apologies in re my "rant". I'll grant that I may have been a bit overprotective today -- oddly enough probably due to a email talk with a friend on
- /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg00364.html (13,123 bytes)
- 3. Re: Left Lane Bandits (v.long, & no LBC) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:44:57 EDT
- I'm not absolutely certain, but didn't the feds threaten to withhold money if they didn't enact a limit?
- /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg00378.html (7,275 bytes)
- 4. RE: Left Lane Bandits (v.long, & no LBC) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:20:28 -0500
- There was never a time (in our lives) when Montana had "no speed limit". On some wide-open-spaces highways, however, the speed limit was not a fixed number but a legal term: "reasonable and prudent"
- /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg00379.html (8,261 bytes)
- 5. Re: Left Lane Bandits (v.long, & no LBC) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
- On the subject of Left Lane Banditry: Time to declare peace! For the record, I do not advocate speeds which under any set of circumstances may endanger the lives of others on the highway. The "90 mp
- /html/triumphs/2001-06/msg00410.html (8,218 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu