- 1. Copyright (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 01:05:24 +0100charset="iso-8859-1"
- So, likely, BMW would have to note the copyright infringement, show proof that they legally owned the rights, contact the courts and Ken Bertschy and issue him a cease and desist order, and prosecute
- /html/triumphs/1999-06/msg00773.html (8,642 bytes)
- 2. Re: Copyright (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 04:47:38 -0600
- John, in America, copyrights are distinctly different than patented trademarks. Representation of patented names are protected free speech, already determined by several high court cases, as long as
- /html/triumphs/1999-06/msg00775.html (13,146 bytes)
- 3. Re: Copyright (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:52:22 -0600
- Perhaps I need to clarify a bit, as well. The law here, as in Great Britain, regarding registered trademarks (logos, etc.), forbids use of that symbol without permission of the owner. Registered name
- /html/triumphs/1999-06/msg00839.html (11,203 bytes)
- 4. Re: Copyright (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 12:44:51 +0100charset="iso-8859-1"
- Borrowing a registered trademark symbol for one's Which is the point I was trying to make This is the nub of the issue <G>. Many think the logo is defunct because the cars have not been made since 19
- /html/triumphs/1999-06/msg00886.html (7,321 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu