- 1. [TR] Hypothetical (score: 1)
- Author: William Pugh <anabil007@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:41:33 -0700
- If the Triumph Community had access to parts that were NOS and or Better, just what parts would it want? This is a serious question, and is not an infringement on Moss, Roadster Factory or anyone els
- /html/triumphs/2014-10/msg00152.html (8,459 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TR] Hypothetical (score: 1)
- Author: "John Macartney" <john.macartney@ukpips.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:09:01 +0100
- Depends which market and product range you're addressing. If it's simply North America, then Spitfire, GT6 and TR. But, given the fact that two seaters only accounted for about 20% of total company o
- /html/triumphs/2014-10/msg00153.html (8,885 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TR] Hypothetical (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:05:06 -0500
- Although many who have gone through frustrating restorations may feel differently, I am going to assume that it would not be realistic to say "everything" so I am going to say high quality critical m
- /html/triumphs/2014-10/msg00154.html (10,386 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TR] Hypothetical (score: 1)
- Author: Chad <triumph74tr6@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:08:30 +0000 (UTC)
- If the Triumph Community had access to parts that were NOS and or Better, just what parts would it want? This is a serious question, and is not an infringement on Moss, Roadster Factory or anyone els
- /html/triumphs/2014-10/msg00155.html (9,397 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TR] Hypothetical (score: 1)
- Author: Brian Induni <binduni@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:07:38 -0700
- I like where your head is Bill. Just so we're clear, when you say NOS, you are talking about New Old Stock and not re-creating new parts, correct? Although I believe there are a good number of people
- /html/triumphs/2014-10/msg00156.html (10,617 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu