Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+End\s+Gear\s+Ratios\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+End\s+Gear\s+Ratios\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: RMEbstein@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:19:17 EST; Hi Everyone, I've been wondering what people on the list run in their Tigers for rear end gear ratios. I know there are some variables such as 4-speed or 5-speed, close or wide ratio and stock versus; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00110.html (7,485 bytes)
2. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: "Kathy and Erich Coiner" <kathy.coiner@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:50:19 -0800; Today I have a nearly stock 260 with headers and a 4 barrel carb. Close ratio toploader and 3.23:1 gears. The car launches nicely and gears are nice and close together. Freeway driving is not a lot o; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00114.html (8,826 bytes)
3. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: Régent Gagnon <regentgagnon@rogers.com; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:07:01 -0500; I use 2.88 with positraction, wide ratio transmission and a warmed up 289. It's perfect for "normal" driving of a Tiger. If I were involved in any competitive activity, I would modify it to suit. Reg; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00116.html (8,304 bytes)
4. RE: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: Dave Munroe <dave@munroe.ca>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:57:49 -0400; My car has a 3.07 rear end and a close ratio top loader. The motor is a 289 bored and stroked to 331, and breathed on rather heavily To produce big torque at the expense of top end hp. This combo all; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00117.html (8,923 bytes)
5. RE: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 09:11:06 -0800; Those would be 3:31 differential gears from your mph/rpm numbers. Bob; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00118.html (7,772 bytes)
6. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: Steve Sage <fastsage@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:44:47 -0700; I've got a great setup for highway driving. 2:88 rear + a 5 speed with .73 5th gear. RPMs are around 2000 at 70. When you hit 100 mph or above (not that I would....wink, wink, wink), there's still lo; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00119.html (8,978 bytes)
7. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: "Paul R. Breuhan" <prbreuhan@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:08:07 -0500; Ask ten people and you will get multiple (10?) answers. It really depends on how you want to use and enjoy your car. I have a 289 with about 300hp (guessing), a toploader of unknown origin, 205/50/1; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00120.html (9,289 bytes)
8. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrrr@peoplepc.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 10:50:54 -0800; I have a "world class" T-5 with 2.95 first gear and .80 overdrive 5th. Rear is 3.73 posi runnning 2.25 VR 40 X 16 Yokohamas. Gives super acceleration out of the hole and cruises about 2600 RPM at 60; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00124.html (8,746 bytes)
9. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: garywinblad@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:35:00 +0000; B9470622 has a stock 260 2bbl stock close ratio top loader, 2.88 rear, bogs off the line, much too busy at 60mph. B9470585 has a stock cam 5.0L, headers, no smog calibration, T-5 wide ratio from '95; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00127.html (8,486 bytes)
10. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:14:09 EST; Interesting the some people think that a stock Tiger cruising at 70MPH and turning 3,000 RPM is acceptable. If you read the literature from the 1960's most people thought this was perfectly acceptabl; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00129.html (8,104 bytes)
11. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:11:04 -0800; What you are observing is the Federal Clean Air Act in action. Federal law required manufacturers to have a "Corporate Average Fuel Economy - "C.A.F.E."", which increased in value with time. The int; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00130.html (10,045 bytes)
12. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: "lgooch" <lgooch@satx.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:57:34 -0600; Are there any gears out there longer than the 2.88 for the Tiger?; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00139.html (7,751 bytes)
13. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: Jim Sencindiver <jd.sencindiver@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:21:45 -0500; I have the original (wide ratio) gears in my Mk II's Toploader, but a DPO swapped in a 3.54 rear end. My 0 - 60 is phenominal, and I can light up the rear tires just by stomping on the gas (in 1st A; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00142.html (8,700 bytes)
14. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: mmcbeth@peacock.ca; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:40:49 -0700; Okay, I'll chime in. I have a 3.07 limited slip differential with a stock close ratio gearbox. This is behind a built 306 (dyno'd at 345hp). This is an acceptable arrangement, but not ideal. The orig; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00144.html (8,535 bytes)
15. Re: Rear End Gear Ratios (score: 1): Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:01:14 -0800; For anyone who is budget minded (or desires a stock appearance) I have long been considering an application that seems to eliminate the problems of the close ratio box and the 1:1 ratio final drive o; /html/tigers/2004-12/msg00147.html (9,536 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]