- 1. Re: cats (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Roach" <rroach@direct.ca>
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 08:36:54 -0800
- Ya Dave, actually they're not failing cars on visual inspections for not having a cat, but it's the whole failing on the emissions test that's a real drag. Just trying to beat it again this year. I'd
- /html/spitfires/2000-02/msg00376.html (6,825 bytes)
- 2. Re: cats (score: 1)
- Author: RIBJEN@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:52:17 EST
- Hey Dave & Ron.... I had my Spit fail the emissions & safety in Missouri because the inspector could not find my cat converter. The emmission readings were fine with out the cat (i had a set of the 4
- /html/spitfires/2000-02/msg00378.html (6,953 bytes)
- 3. Re: cats (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:08:26 -0700
- Next time remove the sticker before taking it in!!! Joe -- "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort." -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
- /html/spitfires/2000-02/msg00383.html (7,382 bytes)
- 4. Re: cats (score: 1)
- Author: "Graham Stretch" <technical-iwnet@lineone.net>
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 20:31:23 -0000
- Hi Ron First our test costs us £30ish. Second my 1300 Toledo with 1500 carbs (freshly rebuilt, jetted for 1500) passed it's test with CO 1.5% I had to richen it up a bit to avoid holes in pistons.
- /html/spitfires/2000-02/msg00387.html (7,551 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu