- 1. Which engine to use ? (score: 1)
- Author: JohnZissler@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:53:52 EST
- Hi all, A question of which engine to use has arisen here, Here are the Engine No 1, this is an untried unit that was taken from a Spit that the owner was restoring, the owner had got as far as bolti
- /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00131.html (9,155 bytes)
- 2. Re: Which engine to use ? (score: 1)
- Author: JohnZissler@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:06:08 EST
- <PRE>Thanks, that is a good idea, but as one engine is not assembled how would do a compression test? and what is a 'leak down' test ? /// spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.
- /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00132.html (6,788 bytes)
- 3. Re: Which engine to use ? (score: 1)
- Author: Douglas Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:40:20 -0500
- I suggest using engine #1 with its original head, because it sounds like you can can get it installed and running with the least amount of work. And I would not worry about that head. If the head is
- /html/spitfires/2002-12/msg00133.html (7,293 bytes)
- 4. which engine to use ? (score: 1)
- Author: JohnZissler@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:29:35 EDT
- Hi, I recently acquired a Spit Mk IV chassis with engine and gearbox (not overdrive unfortunately). Now I also have a Spit Mk II engine ( FD 23635HE) valve seats converted to unleaded. I wonder if th
- /html/spitfires/2002-08/msg00144.html (7,330 bytes)
- 5. RE: which engine to use ? (score: 1)
- Author: "bschwart@postoffice.pacbell.net"
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:50:05 -0400
- The old MK2 engine is only 1147 cc and has siamesed intake ports. The later engine is a 1296 displacement with a better breathing 4 port intake head (but some say comparatively weak bottom end bearin
- /html/spitfires/2002-08/msg00158.html (7,678 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu